Configuring Networks and Devices with Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
draft-ietf-snmpconf-bcp-12

Revision 11 received and being reviewed by AD.
Are we happy with the references still refering to the SNMPv3 docs at DS instead of the new docs at STD level.
AD checking with authorsAD checking with authors.

Document has been approved by IESG as Informational.
However the NITs as posted to the WG mailing list by Bert Wijnen on 12/12/2002 need to be addressed in a new revision.

Wg chairs informed me (AD) that author who has nroff source is on vacation and so we should not expect new rev untill early 2003.

When new rev arrives, AD to check that NITs were properly addressed, and if so, give go-ahead to publish as Informational

Document has been approved by IESG as Informational.
However the NITs as posted to the WG mailing list by Bert Wijnen on 12/12/2002.

Wg chairs informed me (AD) that author who has nroff source is on vacation and so we should not expect new rev untill early 2003.

When new rev arrives, AD to check that NITs were properly addressed, and if so, give go-ahead to publish as Informational.

new rev is expectd,
AD to give go-ahead
then announcement to be sent

Bert forwarded nits to the authors and asked them to do a revision 11 first.  Once Bert has that he will check and inform Secretariat that announcement can be sent.

Note: The one author who has the nroff source is out of the country till end this year. So it may in fact take till early Jan before we will see the revision that addresses Bert's nits.

My NITs to: draft-ietf-snmpconf-bcp-10.txt

- Remove the "Best" from phrases like "Best Current Practice"
  Do so also for places where it is all lower-case.
  I understand that this is still aleft over from the time
  that the WG wanted this to be a BCP doc. Now that we go
  for informational we should not suggest that this is bcp.

- Split references in normative and informative.
  Since this is Informational, maybe they are all informative.

- page 4 2nd para, last sentence
  Well, is it really a sentence??

- page 38 SnmpSetSerialNo
  remove the SNMPv2. It is SNMP version independent.
  The new replacement for RFC1907 has removed this too.
  So better be in sync.

- I wonder, do we want to get a MIB OID assigned under experimental
  for the BLDG-HVAC-MIB? Then either do so and fill in the OID
  or add IANA considerations so they know to assign it.
  If we do not want to ask for an assignment, then maybe make that
  clear in a comment, so no one if confused.
  Eitehr way is fine with me.

- In the STorageType objects, you must add some text as to which
  objects must be writable for permanent rows (as per RFC2579).
  Probably the proper thing is to add:

      Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not allow
      write-access to any columnar objects in the row.
 
- There is no specific "Security Considerations Section".
  But section 6 does talk about security. So maybe a "Securi