Ballot for draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
The obvious next comment is "Where is the YANG module?!" :-)
Thank you for a clearly written document. I have some very editorial corrections to suggest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §4.1.2: > invalid packets that have been identified. There are two kind of "...two kinds..." > - The Border Relay (BR) will validates the received packet's source "...will validate..." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §5: > DESCRIPTION > "Indicates that the PSID is represented as hexidecimal for > clarity." "...hexadecimal..." ^
Please consider using the boilerplate from RFC 8174 rather than 2119. There are some lower case instances of normative keywords.
Please expand "Customer Edge (CE)" on first use.
A nit - maybe adding a paragraph mentioning that from manageability perspective this document specifies only a subset of what corresponding YANG module defined in I-D softwire-yang provides would be suitable.