%% You should probably cite rfc8026 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-softwire-unified-cpe-05, number = {draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe/05/}, author = {Mohamed Boucadair and Ian Farrer}, title = {{Unified IPv4-in-IPv6 Softwire CPE}}, pagetotal = 10, year = 2016, month = aug, day = 25, abstract = {In IPv6-only provider networks, transporting IPv4 packets encapsulated in IPv6 is a common solution to the problem of IPv4 service continuity. A number of differing functional approaches have been developed for this, each having their own specific characteristics. As these approaches share a similar functional architecture and use the same data plane mechanisms, this memo specifies a DHCPv6 option whereby a single CPE can interwork with all of the standardized and proposed approaches to providing encapsulated IPv4 in IPv6 services.}, }