SPEERMINT Routing Architecture Message Flows
draft-ietf-speermint-flows-05
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(speermint WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Hadriel Kaplan , Daryl Malas , Sohel Khan , Reinaldo Penno , Adam Uzelac | ||
| Last updated | 2009-11-02 (Latest revision 2009-03-09) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes example message flows associated with the SPEERMINT routing architecture, relative to various peering scenarios.
Authors
Hadriel Kaplan
Daryl Malas
Sohel Khan
Reinaldo Penno
Adam Uzelac
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)