%% You should probably cite rfc8946 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-stir-passport-divert-04, number = {draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-04}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert/04/}, author = {Jon Peterson}, title = {{PASSporT Extension for Diverted Calls}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2018, month = oct, day = 23, abstract = {This document extends PASSporT, which conveys cryptographically- signed information about the people involved in personal communications, to include an indication that a call has been diverted from its original destination to a new one. This information can greatly improve the decisions made by verification services in call forwarding scenarios. Also specified here is an encapsulation mechanism for nesting a PASSporT within another PASSporT that assists relying parties in some diversion scenarios.}, }