Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers
draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ben@nostrum.com, draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers'
  (draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Murray Kucherawy and Francesca Palombini.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob/

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   The Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (STIR) framework defines
   means of carrying its Persona Assertion Tokens (PASSporTs) either in-
   band, within the headers of a SIP request, or out-of-band, through a
   service that stores PASSporTs for retrieval by relying parties.  This
   specification defines a way that the out-of-band conveyance of
   PASSporTs can be used to support large service providers, for cases
   in which in-band STIR conveyance is not universally available.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Ben Campbell. The Responsible
   Area Director is Murray Kucherawy.

IANA Note

  (Insert IANA Note here or remove section)

RFC Editor Note