Skip to main content

Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers
draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-07

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ben@nostrum.com, draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Out-of-Band STIR for Service Providers'
  (draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Murray Kucherawy and Francesca Palombini.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   The Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (STIR) framework defines
   means of carrying its Persona Assertion Tokens (PASSporTs) either in-
   band, within the headers of a SIP request, or out-of-band, through a
   service that stores PASSporTs for retrieval by relying parties.  This
   specification defines a way that the out-of-band conveyance of
   PASSporTs can be used to support large service providers, for cases
   in which in-band STIR conveyance is not universally available.

Working Group Summary

   The consensus was mainly among a small group of individuals, but that is
   mostly standard operating procedure for the STIR working groups. Active 
   participants comprise a small number of industry experts.

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  
   Have a  significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  

     The shepherd is aware of multiple non-public implementation 
     efforts, but is not aware of any publicly available reports.

   Are there any reviewers that merit special mention as having 
   done a thorough review, e.g., one that resulted in important 
   changes or a conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?

     Please consider Simon Castle, Pierce Gorman, and Richard Shockey
     for inclusion in the Acknowledgments section.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Ben Campbell. 
   The Responsible Area Director is Orie Steele.

RFC Editor Note