%% You should probably cite rfc9124 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-suit-information-model-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-suit-information-model-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-suit-information-model/03/},
    author =    {Brendan Moran and Hannes Tschofenig and Henk Birkholz},
    title =     {{Firmware Updates for Internet of Things Devices - An Information Model for Manifests}},
    pagetotal = 36,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {Vulnerabilities with Internet of Things (IoT) devices have raised the need for a solid and secure firmware update mechanism that is also suitable for constrained devices. Incorporating such an update mechanism to fix vulnerabilities, to update configuration settings, as well as adding new functionality is recommended by security experts. One component of such a firmware update is a concise and machine- processable meta-data document, or manifest, that describes the firmware image(s) and offers appropriate protection. This document describes the information that must be present in the manifest.},
}