%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn-16 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn-12,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn-12},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-generalized-ecn/12/},
    author =    {Marcelo Bagnulo and Bob Briscoe},
    title =     {{ECN++: Adding Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to TCP Control Packets}},
    pagetotal = 50,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document specifies an experimental modification to ECN when used with TCP. It allows the use of ECN in the IP header of the following TCP packets: SYNs, SYN/ACKs, pure ACKs, Window probes, FINs, RSTs and retransmissions. This specification obsoletes RFC5562, which described a different way to use ECN on SYN/ACKs alone.},
}