Ballot for draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
No Record
Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-16 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Comments ### S4.2 * Up to you if you want to include it or not, but an alternative/additional option might be use of draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id. ### S5.2.2 * Random, untested thought: it would in theory be possible to put the 5QI info in an IPv6 address (a la S4.2), presumably preceding the S-NSSAI. In this way, a provider might be able to augment DSCP treatment with whatever per-prefix TE might be arranged (where the prefix length covers the 5QI byte). Just random noise, though; ignore me. ## Nits ### S4 * "following sections list few" -> "following sections list a few"
I'm a co-author of the document.