%% You should probably cite rfc8131 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-05, number = {draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc/05/}, author = {Xian Zhang and Haomian Zheng and Rakesh Gandhi and Zafar Ali and Pawel Brzozowski}, title = {{RSVP-TE Signaling Procedure for End-to-End GMPLS Restoration and Resource Sharing}}, pagetotal = 14, year = 2016, month = aug, day = 16, abstract = {In non-packet transport networks, there are requirements where Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) end-to-end recovery scheme needs to employ restoration Label Switched Path (LSP) while keeping resources for the working and/or protecting LSPs reserved in the network after the failure occurs. This document reviews how the LSP association is to be provided using Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling in the context of GMPLS end-to-end recovery scheme when using restoration LSP where failed LSP is not torn down. In addition, this document discusses resource sharing-based setup and teardown of LSPs as well as LSP reversion procedures. No new signaling extensions are defined by this document, and it is strictly informative in nature.}, }