%% You should probably cite rfc7551 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03, number = {draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp/03/}, author = {Fei Zhang and Ruiquan Jing and Rakesh Gandhi}, title = {{RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs}}, pagetotal = 20, year = 2015, month = feb, day = 14, abstract = {This document describes Resource reSerVation Protocol (RSVP) extensions to bind two point-to-point unidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) into an associated bidirectional LSP. The association is achieved by defining new Association Types for use in ASSOCIATION and in Extended ASSOCIATION Objects. One of these types enables independent provisioning of the associated bidirectional LSPs on both sides, while the other enables single sided provisioning. The REVERSE\_LSP Object is also defined to enable a single endpoint to specify all the parameters of an associated LSP in the single sided provisioning case.}, }