%% You should probably cite rfc7898 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects/04/},
    author =    {Dhruv Dhody and Udayasree Palle and Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy and Ramon Casellas},
    title =     {{Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)}},
    pagetotal = 18,
    year =      2015,
    month =     nov,
    day =       19,
    abstract =  {The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) specification and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly included in a path setup. Further Exclude Routes extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be explicitly excluded in a path setup. This document specifies new subobjects to include or exclude 4-Byte Autonomous System (AS) and Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) area during path setup.},
}