Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path
draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-09
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(teas WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zafar Ali , Clarence Filsfils , Julien Meuric , Kenji Kumaki , Ruediger Kunze | ||
| Last updated | 2020-01-23 (Latest revision 2019-07-22) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Vishnu Pavan Beeram | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics such as cost, delay and delay variation associated with the TE link formed by Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support automatic collection of cost, delay and delay variation information for the TE link formed by a LSP.
Authors
Zafar Ali
Clarence Filsfils
Julien Meuric
Kenji Kumaki
Ruediger Kunze
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)