A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths and Interfaces
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-32
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (teas WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tarek Saad , Rakesh Gandhi , Xufeng Liu , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Igor Bryskin , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios | ||
| Last updated | 2023-03-12 | ||
| Replaces | draft-saad-teas-yang-te | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Yang Validation | 0 errors, 0 warnings | ||
| Reviews |
YANGDOCTORS Early review
(of
-21)
On the Right Track
|
||
| Additional resources |
Yang catalog entry for ietf-te-device@2020-07-12.yang
Yang catalog entry for ietf-te@2020-07-12.yang Yang impact analysis for draft-ietf-teas-yang-te Mailing list discussion |
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Lou Berger | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | lberger@labn.net |
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-32
TEAS Working Group T. Saad
Internet-Draft R. Gandhi
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems Inc
Expires: 13 September 2023 X. Liu
IBM Corporation
V. P. Beeram
Juniper Networks
I. Bryskin
Individual
O. Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
12 March 2023
A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels, Label Switched Paths
and Interfaces
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-32
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for the provisioning and
management of Traffic Engineering (TE) tunnels, Label Switched Paths
(LSPs), and interfaces. The model covers data that is independent of
any technology or dataplane encapsulation and is divided into two
YANG modules that cover device-specific, and device independent data.
This model covers data for configuration, operational state, remote
procedural calls, and event notifications.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 September 2023.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terms and Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.4. Model Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Design Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. State Data Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Module Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. TE YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.1. Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.1.1. TE Globals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1.2. TE Tunnels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.1.3. TE LSPs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6. TE Device YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6.1. Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6.1.1. TE Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
6.2. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
6.3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
7. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
10. Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
11. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
12. Appendix A: Data Tree Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
12.1. Basic Tunnel Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
12.2. Global Named Path Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
12.3. Tunnel with Global Path Constraint . . . . . . . . . . . 76
12.4. Tunnel with Per-tunnel Path Constraint . . . . . . . . . 77
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
12.5. Tunnel State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
12.6. Example TE Tunnel with Primary and Secondary Paths . . . 79
13. Appendix B: Full Model Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
14.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
14.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
1. Introduction
YANG [RFC6020] and [RFC7950] is a data modeling language that was
introduced to define the contents of a conceptual data store that
allows networked devices to be managed using NETCONF [RFC6241]. YANG
has proved relevant beyond its initial confines, as bindings to other
interfaces (e.g. RESTCONF [RFC8040]) and encoding other than XML
(e.g. JSON) are being defined. Furthermore, YANG data models can be
used as the basis of implementation for other interfaces, such as CLI
and programmatic APIs.
This document describes a YANG data model for Traffic Engineering
(TE) tunnels, Label Switched Paths (LSPs), and interfaces. The data
model is divided into two YANG modules. The module 'ietf-te.yang'
includes data that is generic and device-independent, while the
module 'ietf-te-device.yang' includes data that is device-specific.
The document describes a high-level relationship between the modules
defined in this document, as well as other external protocol YANG
modules. The TE generic YANG data model does not include any data
specific to a signaling protocol. It is expected other data plane
technology model(s) will augment the TE generic YANG data model.
Also, it is expected other YANG modules that model TE signaling
protocols, such as RSVP-TE ([RFC3209], [RFC3473]), or Segment-Routing
TE (SR-TE) [RFC9256] will augment the generic TE YANG module.
2. Terms and Conventions
2.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
2.2. Terminology
The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are used in this
specification:
* client
* configuration data
* state data
This document also makes use of the following terminology introduced
in the YANG Data Modeling Language [RFC7950]:
* augment
* data model
* data node
2.3. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects
are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1.
+=================+======================+===============+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+=================+======================+===============+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| te-types | ietf-te-types | [RFC8776] |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| te-packet-types | ietf-te-packet-types | [RFC8776] |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| te | ietf-te | this document |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
| te-dev | ietf-te-device | this document |
+-----------------+----------------------+---------------+
Table 1: Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
2.4. Model Tree Diagrams
The tree diagrams extracted from the module(s) defined in this
document are given in subsequent sections as per the syntax defined
in [RFC8340].
3. Design Considerations
This document describes a generic TE YANG data model that is
independent of any dataplane technology. One of the design
objectives is to allow specific data plane technology models to reuse
the TE generic data model and possibly augment it with technology
specific data.
The elements of the generic TE YANG data model, including TE Tunnels,
LSPs, and interfaces have leaf(s) that identify the technology layer
where they reside. For example, the LSP encoding type can identify
the technology associated with a TE Tunnel or LSP.
Also, the generic TE YANG data model does not cover signaling
protocol data. The signaling protocol used to instantiate TE LSPs
are outside the scope of this document and expected to be covered by
augmentations defined in other document(s).
The following other design considerations are taken into account with
respect to data organization:
* The generic TE YANG data model 'ietf-te' contains device
independent data and can be used to model data off a device (e.g.
on a TE controller). When the model is used to manage a specific
device, the model contains the TE Tunnels originating from the
specific device. When the model is used to manage a TE
controller, the 'tunnels' list contains all TE Tunnels and TE
tunnel segments originating from device(s) that the TE controller
manages.
* The device-specific TE data is defined in module 'ietf-te-device'
as shown in Figure 1.
* In general, minimal elements in the model are designated as
"mandatory" to allow freedom to vendors to adapt the data model to
their specific product implementation.
* Suitable defaults are specified for all configurable elements.
* The model declares a number of TE functions as features that can
be optionally supported.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
3.1. State Data Organization
The Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]
addresses modeling state data for ephemeral objects. This document
adopts the NMDA model for configuration and state data representation
as per IETF guidelines for new IETF YANG models.
4. Model Overview
The data models defined in this document cover the core TE features
that are commonly supported by different vendor implementations. The
support of extended or vendor specific TE feature(s) is expected to
either be in augmentations, or deviations to this model that are
defined in separate documents.
4.1. Module Relationship
The generic TE YANG data model that is defined in "ietf-te.yang"
covers the building blocks that are device independent and agnostic
of any specific technology or control plane instances. The TE device
model defined in "ietf-te-device.yang" augments the generic TE YANG
data model and covers data that is specific to a device -- for
example, attributes of TE interfaces, or TE timers that are local to
a TE node.
The TE data models for specific instances of data plane technology
exist in separate YANG modules that augment the generic TE YANG data
model. The TE data models for specific instances of signaling
protocols are outside the scope of this document and are defined in
other documents. For example, the RSVP-TE YANG model augmentation of
the TE model is covered in a separate document.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
TE generic +---------+ o: augment
module | ietf-te |o-------------+
+---------+ \
o \
|\ \
| \ TE device module \
| +----------------+ \
| | ietf-te-device | \
| +----------------+ \
| o \
| / \
| / \
+---------------+ +---------------+
RSVP-TE module | ietf-rsvp-te^ |o . | ietf-te-mpls^ |
+---------------+ \ +---------------+
| \
| \
| \
| \
| \
o +-------------------+
+------------+ | ietf-rsvp-otn-te^ |
RSVP module | ietf-rsvp^ | +-------------------+
+------------+ RSVP-TE with OTN
extensions
X---oY indicates that module X augments module Y
^ indicates a module defined in other documents
Figure 1: Relationship of TE module(s) with signaling protocol
modules
5. TE YANG Model
The generic TE YANG module ('ietf-te') is meant for the management
and operation of a TE network. This includes creating, modifying and
retrieving information about TE Tunnels, LSPs, and interfaces and
their associated attributes (e.g. Administrative-Groups, SRLGs,
etc.).
A full tree diagram of the TE model is shown in the Appendix in
Figure 13.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
5.1. Module Structure
The 'te' container is the top level container in the 'ietf-te'
module. The presence of the 'te' container enables TE function
system wide. Below provides further descriptions of containers that
exist under the 'te' top level container.
There are three further containers grouped under the 'te' container
as shown in Figure 2 and described below.
globals:
The 'globals' container maintains the set of global TE attributes
that can be applicable to TE Tunnels and interfaces.
tunnels:
The 'tunnels' container includes the list of TE Tunnels that are
instantiated. Refer to Section 5.1.2 for further details on the
properties of a TE Tunnel.
lsps:
The 'lsps' container includes the list of TE LSP(s) that are
instantiated for TE Tunnels. Refer to Section 5.1.3 for further
details on the properties of a TE LSP.
The model also contains two Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) as shown in
Figure 13 and described below.
tunnels-path-compute:
A RPC to request path computation for a specific TE Tunnel. The
RPC allows requesting path computation using atomic and stateless
operation. A tunnel may also be configured in 'compute-only' mode
to provide stateful path updates - see Section 5.1.2 for further
details.
tunnels-action:
An RPC to request a specific action (e.g. reoptimize, or tear-and-
setup) to be taken on a specific tunnel or all tunnels.
Figure 13 shows the relationships of these containers and RPCs within
the 'ietf-te' module.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
module: ietf-te
+--rw te!
+--rw globals
| ...
+--rw tunnels
| ...
+--ro lsps
...
rpcs:
+---x tunnels-path-compute
| +---w input
| | ...
| +--ro output
| ...
+---x tunnels-actions
+---w input
| ...
+--ro output
...
Figure 2: TE Tunnel model high-level YANG tree view
5.1.1. TE Globals
The 'globals' container covers properties that control a TE feature's
behavior system-wide, and its respective state as shown in Figure 3
and described in the text that follows.
+--rw globals
| +--rw named-admin-groups
| | +--rw named-admin-group* [name]
| | ...
| +--rw named-srlgs
| | +--rw named-srlg* [name]
| | ...
| +--rw named-path-constraints
| +--rw named-path-constraint* [name]
Figure 3: TE globals YANG subtree high-level structure
named-admin-groups:
A YANG container for the list of named (extended) administrative
groups that may be applied to TE links.
named-srlgs:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
A YANG container for the list of named Shared Risk Link Groups
(SRLGs) that may be applied to TE links.
named-path-constraints:
A YANG container for a list of named path constraints. Each named
path constraint is composed of a set of constraints that can be
applied during path computation. A named path constraint can be
applied to multiple TE Tunnels. Path constraints may also be
specified directly under the TE Tunnel. The path constraints
specified under the TE Tunnel take precedence over the path
constraints derived from the referenced named path constraint. A
named path constraint entry can be formed of the path constraints
shown in Figure 4:
| +--rw named-path-constraints
| +--rw named-path-constraint* [name]
| {te-types:named-path-constraints}?
| +--rw name string
| +--rw te-bandwidth
| | ...
| +--rw link-protection? identityref
| +--rw setup-priority? uint8
| +--rw hold-priority? uint8
| +--rw signaling-type? identityref
| +--rw path-metric-bounds
| | ...
| +--rw path-affinities-values
| | ...
| +--rw path-affinity-names
| | ...
| +--rw path-srlgs-lists
| | ...
| +--rw path-srlgs-names
| | ...
| +--rw disjointness?
| | te-path-disjointness
| +--rw explicit-route-objects-always
| | ...
| +--rw path-in-segment!
| | ...
| +--rw path-out-segment!
| ...
Figure 4: Named path constraints YANG subtree
o name: A YANG leaf that holds the named path constraint
entry. This is unique in the list and used as a key.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
o te-bandwidth: A YANG container that holds the technology
agnostic TE bandwidth constraint.
o link-protection: A YANG leaf that holds the link protection
type constraint required for the links to be included in the
computed path.
o setup/hold priority: YANG leafs that hold the LSP setup and
hold admission priority as defined in [RFC3209].
o signaling-type: A YANG leaf that holds the LSP setup type,
such as RSVP-TE or SR.
o path-metric-bounds: A YANG container that holds the set of
metric bounds applicable on the computed TE tunnel path.
o path-affinities-values: A YANG container that holds the set
of affinity values and mask to be used during path
computation.
o path-affinity-names: A YANG container that holds the set of
named affinity constraints and corresponding inclusion or
exclusion instructions for each to be used during path
computation.
o path-srlgs-lists: A YANG container that holds the set of
SRLG values and corresponding inclusion or exclusion
instructions to be used during path computation.
o path-srlgs-names: A YANG container that holds the set of
named SRLG constraints and corresponding inclusion or
exclusion instructions for each to be used during path
computation.
o disjointness: The level of resource disjointness constraint
that the secondary path of a TE tunnel has to adhere to.
o explicit-route-objects-always: A YANG container that
contains two route objects lists:
+ 'route-object-exclude-always': a list of route entries to
always exclude from the path computation.
+ 'route-object-include-exclude': a list of route entries
to include or exclude in the path computation.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
The 'route-object-include-exclude' is used to configure
constraints on which route objects (e.g., nodes, links) are
included or excluded in the path computation.
The interpretation of an empty 'route-object-include-
exclude' list depends on the TE Tunnel (end-to-end or Tunnel
Segment) and on the specific path, according to the
following rules:
1. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for the
primary path of an end-to-end TE Tunnel indicates that
there are no route objects to be included or excluded in
the path computation.
2. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for the
primary path of a TE Tunnel Segment indicates that no
primary LSP is required for that TE Tunnel.
3. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for a
reverse path means it always follows the forward path
(i.e., the TE Tunnel is co-routed). When the 'route-
object-include-exclude' list is not empty, the reverse
path is routed independently of the forward path.
4. An empty 'route-object-include-exclude' list for the
secondary (forward) path indicates that the secondary
path has the same endpoints as the primary path.
o path-in-segment: A YANG container that contains a list of
label restrictions that have to be taken into considerations
when crossing domains. This TE tunnel segment in this case
is being stitched to the upstream TE tunnel segment.
o path-out-segment: A YANG container that contains a list of
label restrictions that have to be taken into considerations
when crossing domains. The TE tunnel segment in this case
is being stitched to the downstream TE tunnel segment.
5.1.2. TE Tunnels
The 'tunnels' container holds the list of TE Tunnels that are
provisioned on devices in the network as shown in Figure 5.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
+--rw tunnels
| +--rw tunnel* [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw alias? string
| +--rw identifier? uint32
| +--rw color? uint32
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw admin-state? identityref
| +--ro operational-state? identityref
| +--rw encoding? identityref
| +--rw switching-type? identityref
| +--rw source? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw destination? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw src-tunnel-tp-id? binary
| +--rw dst-tunnel-tp-id? binary
| +--rw bidirectional? boolean
| +--rw controller
| | +--rw protocol-origin? identityref
| | +--rw controller-entity-id? string
| +--rw reoptimize-timer? uint16
| +--rw association-objects
| | +--rw association-object* [association-key]
| | | ...
| | +--rw association-object-extended* [association-key]
| | ...
| +--rw protection
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw protection-type? identityref
| | +--rw protection-reversion-disable? boolean
| | +--rw hold-off-time? uint32
| | +--rw wait-to-revert? uint16
| | +--rw aps-signal-id? uint8
| +--rw restoration
| | +--rw enable? boolean
| | +--rw restoration-type? identityref
| | +--rw restoration-scheme? identityref
| | +--rw restoration-reversion-disable? boolean
| | +--rw hold-off-time? uint32
| | +--rw wait-to-restore? uint16
| | +--rw wait-to-revert? uint16
| +--rw te-topology-identifier
| | +--rw provider-id? te-global-id
| | +--rw client-id? te-global-id
| | +--rw topology-id? te-topology-id
| +--rw te-bandwidth
| | +--rw (technology)?
| | ...
| +--rw link-protection? identityref
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| +--rw setup-priority? uint8
| +--rw hold-priority? uint8
| +--rw signaling-type? identityref
| +--rw hierarchy
| | +--rw dependency-tunnels
| | | ...
| | +--rw hierarchical-link
| | ...
| +--rw primary-paths
| | +--rw primary-path* [name]
| | ...
| +--rw secondary-paths
| | +--rw secondary-path* [name]
| | ...
| +--rw secondary-reverse-paths
| | +--rw secondary-reverse-path* [name]
| | ...
| +---x tunnel-action
| | +---w input
| | | ...
| | +--ro output
| | ...
| +---x protection-external-commands
| +---w input
| ...
Figure 5: TE Tunnel list YANG subtree structure
When the model is used to manage a specific device, the 'tunnels'
list contains the TE Tunnels originating from the specific device.
When the model is used to manage a TE controller, the 'tunnels' list
contains all TE Tunnels and TE tunnel segments originating from
device(s) that the TE controller manages.
The TE Tunnel model allows the configuration and management of the
following TE tunnel objects:
TE Tunnel:
A YANG container of one or more TE LSPs established between the
source and destination TE Tunnel termination points.
TE Path:
An engineered path that once instantiated in the forwarding plane
can be used to forward traffic from the source to the destination
TE Tunnel termination points.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
TE LSP:
A TE LSP is a connection-oriented service established over a TE
Path and that allows the delivery of traffic between the TE Tunnel
source and destination termination points.
TE Tunnel Segment:
A part of a multi-domain TE Tunnel that is within a specific
network domain.
The TE Tunnel has a number of attributes that are set directly under
the tunnel (as shown in Figure 5). The main attributes of a TE
Tunnel are described below:
operational-state:
A YANG leaf that holds the operational state of the tunnel.
name:
A YANG leaf that holds the name of a TE Tunnel. The name of the
TE Tunnel uniquely identifies the tunnel within the TE tunnel
list. The name of the TE Tunnel can be formatted as a Uniform
Resource Indicator (URI) by including the namespace to ensure
uniqueness of the name amongst all the TE Tunnels present on
devices and controllers. The configured TE Tunnels can be
reported with the name of the device embedded within the TE Tunnel
name. For initiated TE Tunnels from the controller, the
controller is responsible to ensures that TE Tunnel names are
unique.
alias:
A YANG leaf that holds an alternate name to the TE tunnel. Unlike
the TE tunnel name, the alias can be modified at any time during
the lifetime of the TE tunnel.
identifier:
A YANG leaf that holds an identifier of the tunnel. This
identifier is unique amongst tunnels originated from the same
ingress device.
color:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
A YANG leaf that holds the color associated with the TE tunnel.
The color is used to map or steer services that carry matching
color on to the TE tunnel as described in [RFC9012].
admin-state:
A YANG leaf that holds the tunnel administrative state. The
administrative status in state datastore transitions to 'tunnel-
admin-up' when the tunnel used by the client layer, and to
'tunnel-admin-down' when it is not used by the client layer.
operational-state:
A YANG leaf that holds the tunnel operational state.
encoding/switching:
The 'encoding' and 'switching-type' are YANG leafs that define the
specific technology in which the tunnel operates in as described
in [RFC3945].
source/destination:
YANG leafs that define the tunnel source and destination node
endpoints.
src-tunnel-tp-id/dst-tunnel-tp-id:
YANG leafs that hold the identifiers of source and destination TE
Tunnel Termination Points (TTPs) [RFC8795] residing on the source
and destination nodes. The TTP identifiers are optional on nodes
that have a single TTP per node. For example, TTP identifiers are
optional for packet (IP/MPLS) routers.
bidirectional:
A YANG leaf that when present indicates the LSP of a TE Tunnel is
bidirectional and co-routed as defined in [rfc3473].
controller:
A YANG container that holds tunnel data relevant to an optional
external TE controller that may initiate or control a tunnel.
This target node may be augmented by external module(s), for
example, to add data for PCEP initiated and/or delegated tunnels.
reoptimize-timer:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
A YANG leaf to set the interval period for tunnel reoptimization.
association-objects:
A YANG container that holds the set of associations of the TE
Tunnel to other TE Tunnels. Associations at the TE Tunnel level
apply to all paths of the TE Tunnel. The TE tunnel associations
can be overridden by associations configured directly under the TE
Tunnel path.
protection:
A YANG container that holds the TE Tunnel protection properties.
restoration:
A YANG container that holds the TE Tunnel restoration properties.
te-topology-identifier:
A YANG container that holds the topology identifier associated
with the topology where paths for the TE tunnel are computed.
hierarchy:
A YANG container that holds hierarchy related properties of the TE
Tunnel. A TE LSP can be set up in MPLS or Generalized MPLS
(GMPLS) networks to be used as a TE link to carry traffic in other
(client) networks [RFC6107]. In this case, the model introduces
the TE Tunnel hierarchical link endpoint parameters to identify
the specific link in the client layer that the underlying TE
Tunnel is associated with. The hierarchy container includes the
following:
o dependency-tunnels: A set of hierarchical TE Tunnels
provisioned or to be provisioned in the immediate lower
layer that this TE tunnel depends on for multi-layer path
computation. A dependency TE Tunnel is provisioned if and
only if it is used (selected by path computation) at least
by one client layer TE Tunnel. The TE link in the client
layer network topology supported by a dependent TE Tunnel is
dynamically created only when the dependency TE Tunnel is
actually provisioned.
o hierarchical-link: A YANG container that holds the identity
of the hierarchical link (in the client layer) that is
supported by this TE Tunnel. The endpoints of the
hierarchical link are defined by TE tunnel source and
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
destination node endpoints. The hierarchical link can be
identified by its source and destination link termination
point identifiers.
primary-paths:
A YANG container that holds the list of primary paths. A primary
path is identified by 'name'. A primary path is selected from the
list to instantiate a primary forwarding LSP for the tunnel. The
list of primary paths is visited by order of preference. A
primary path has the following attributes:
- primary-reverse-path: A YANG container that holds properties of
the primary reverse path. The reverse path is applicable to
bidirectional TE Tunnels.
- candidate-secondary-paths: A YANG container that holds a list
of candidate secondary paths which may be used for the primary
path to support path protection. The candidate secondary
path(s) reference path(s) from the tunnel secondary paths list.
The preference of the secondary paths is specified within the
list and dictates the order of visiting the secondary path from
the list. The attributes of a secondary path can be defined
separately from the primary path. The attributes of a
secondary path will be inherited from the associated 'active'
primary when not explicitly defined for the secondary path.
secondary-paths:
A YANG container that holds the set of secondary paths. A
secondary path is identified by 'name'. A secondary path can be
referenced from the TE Tunnel's 'candidate-secondary-path' list.
secondary-reverse-paths:
A YANG container that holds the set of secondary reverse paths. A
secondary reverse path is identified by 'name'. A secondary
reverse path can be referenced from the TE Tunnel's 'candidate-
secondary-reverse-paths' list. A secondary reverse path contains
attributes similar to a primary path.
The following set of common path attributes are shared for primary
(forward and reverse) and secondary paths:
path-computation-method:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
A YANG leaf that specifies the method used for computing the TE
path.
path-computation-server:
A YANG container that holds the path computation server properties
when the path is externally queried.
compute-only:
A path of a TE Tunnel is, by default, provisioned so that it can
be instantiated in the forwarding plane so that it can carry
traffic as soon as a valid path is computed. In some cases, a TE
path may be configured only for the purpose of computing a path
and reporting it without the need to instantiate the LSP or commit
any resources. In such a case, the path is configured in
'compute-only' mode to distinguish it from the default behavior.
A 'compute-only' path is configured as a usual with the associated
per path constraint(s) and properties on a device or TE
controller. The device or TE controller computes the feasible
path(s) subject to configured constraints. A client may query the
'compute-only' computed path properties 'on-demand', or
alternatively, can subscribe to be notified of computed path(s)
and whenever the path properties change.
use-path-computation:
A YANG leaf that indicates whether or not path computation is to
be used for a specified path.
lockdown:
A YANG leaf that when set indicates the existing path should not
be reoptimized after a failure on any of its traversed links.
path-scope:
A YANG leaf that specifies the path scope if segment or an end-to-
end path.
preference:
A YANG leaf that specifies the preference for the path. The lower
the number higher the preference.
k-requested-paths:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
A YANG leaf that specifies the number of k-shortest-paths
requested from the path computation server and returned sorted by
its optimization objective.
association-objects:
A YANG container that holds a list of tunnel association
properties.
optimizations:
A YANG container that holds the optimization objectives that path
computation will use to select a path.
named-path-constraint:
A YANG leafref that references an entry from the global list of
named path constraints.
te-bandwidth:
A YANG container that holds the path bandwidth (see [RFC8776]).
link-protection:
A YANG leaf that specifies the link protection type required for
the links to be included the computed path (see [RFC8776]).
setup/hold-priority:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
signaling-type:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. This value overrides
the provided one in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-metric-bounds:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-affinities-values:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
path-affinity-names:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-srlgs-lists:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-srlgs-names:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
disjointness:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
explicit-route-objects-always:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-in-segment:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
path-out-segment:
see description provided in Section 5.1.1. These values override
those provided in the referenced named-path-constraint.
computed-paths-properties:
A YANG container that holds properties for the list of computed
paths.
computed-path-error-infos:
A YANG container that holds a list of errors related to the path.
lsp-provisioning-error-infos:
A YANG container that holds the list of LSP provisioning error
information.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
lsps:
A YANG container that holds a list of LSPs that have been
instantiated for this specific path.
In addition to the path common attributes, the primary path has the
following attributes that are not present in the secondary path:
* Only the primary path contains the list of 'candidate-secondary-
paths' that can protect the primary path.
* Only the primary path can contain a primary-reverse-path
associated with the primary path (and its associated list of
'candidate-secondary-reverse-path').
5.1.3. TE LSPs
The 'lsps' container includes the set of TE LSP(s) that have been
instantiated. A TE LSP is identified by a 3-tuple ('tunnel-name',
'lsp-id', 'node').
When the model is used to manage a specific device, the 'lsps' list
contains all TE LSP(s) that traverse the device (including
ingressing, transiting and egressing the device).
When the model is used to manage a TE controller, the 'lsps' list
contains all TE LSP(s) that traverse all network devices (including
ingressing, transiting and egressing the device) that the TE
controller manages.
5.2. Tree Diagram
Figure 6 shows the tree diagram of depth=4 for the generic TE YANG
model defined in modules 'ietf-te.yang'. The full tree diagram is
shown in Section 13.
module: ietf-te
+--rw te
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw globals
| +--rw named-admin-groups
| | +--rw named-admin-group* [name]
| | {te-types:extended-admin-groups,
| | te-types:named-extended-admin-groups}?
| | ...
| +--rw named-srlgs
| | +--rw named-srlg* [name] {te-types:named-srlg-groups}?
| | ...
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| +--rw named-path-constraints
| +--rw named-path-constraint* [name]
| {te-types:named-path-constraints}?
| ...
+--rw tunnels
| +--rw tunnel* [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw alias? string
| +--rw identifier? uint32
| +--rw color? uint32
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw admin-state? identityref
| +--ro operational-state? identityref
| +--rw encoding? identityref
| +--rw switching-type? identityref
| +--rw source? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw destination? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw src-tunnel-tp-id? binary
| +--rw dst-tunnel-tp-id? binary
| +--rw bidirectional? boolean
| +--rw controller
| | ...
| +--rw reoptimize-timer? uint16
| +--rw association-objects
| | ...
| +--rw protection
| | ...
| +--rw restoration
| | ...
| +--rw te-topology-identifier
| | ...
| +--rw te-bandwidth
| | ...
| +--rw link-protection? identityref
| +--rw setup-priority? uint8
| +--rw hold-priority? uint8
| +--rw signaling-type? identityref
| +--rw hierarchy
| | ...
| +--rw primary-paths
| | ...
| +--rw secondary-paths
| | ...
| +--rw secondary-reverse-paths
| | ...
| +---x tunnel-action
| | ...
| +---x protection-external-commands
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| ...
+--ro lsps
+--ro lsp* [tunnel-name lsp-id node]
+--ro tunnel-name string
+--ro lsp-id uint16
+--ro node
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro source?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro destination?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro tunnel-id? uint16
+--ro extended-tunnel-id?
| yang:dotted-quad
+--ro operational-state? identityref
+--ro signaling-type? identityref
+--ro origin-type? enumeration
+--ro lsp-resource-status? enumeration
+--ro lockout-of-normal? boolean
+--ro freeze? boolean
+--ro lsp-protection-role? enumeration
+--ro lsp-protection-state? identityref
+--ro protection-group-ingress-node-id?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro protection-group-egress-node-id?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro lsp-actual-route-information
...
rpcs:
+---x tunnels-path-compute
| +---w input
| | +---w path-compute-info
| +--ro output
| +--ro path-compute-result
+---x tunnels-actions
+---w input
| +---w tunnel-info
| | +---w (filter-type)
| | ...
| +---w action-info
| +---w action? identityref
| +---w disruptive? empty
+--ro output
+--ro action-result? identityref
Figure 6: Tree diagram of depth-4 of TE Tunnel YANG data model
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
5.3. YANG Module
The generic TE YANG module 'ietf-te' imports the following modules:
* ietf-yang-types and ietf-inet-types defined in [RFC6991]
* ietf-te-types defined in [RFC8776]
This module references the following documents: [RFC4206], [RFC4427],
[RFC4872], [RFC3209], [RFC6780], [RFC7471], [RFC9012], [RFC8570],
[RFC8232], [RFC7271], [RFC8234], [RFC7308], and [ITU_G.808.1].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-te@2023-03-11.yang"
module ietf-te {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te";
/* Replace with IANA when assigned */
prefix te;
/* Import TE generic types */
import ietf-te-types {
prefix te-types;
reference
"RFC8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering.";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
reference
"RFC6991: Common YANG Data Types.";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC6991: Common YANG Data Types.";
}
organization
"IETF Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group.";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Editor: Tarek Saad
<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
Editor: Rakesh Gandhi
<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Himanshu Shah
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:i_bryskin@yahoo.com>";
description
"YANG data module for TE configuration, state, and RPCs.
The model fully conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note.
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and remove this note.
revision 2023-03-11 {
description
"Initial revision for the TE generic YANG module.";
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels
and Interfaces.";
}
typedef tunnel-ref {
type leafref {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
path "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:name";
}
description
"This type is used by data models that need to reference
configured TE tunnel.";
}
typedef te-gen-node-id {
type union {
type te-types:te-node-id;
type inet:ip-address;
}
description
"Generic type that identifies a node in a TE topology.";
}
/**
* TE tunnel generic groupings
*/
grouping te-generic-node-id {
description
"A reusable grouping for a TE generic node identifier.";
leaf id {
type te-gen-node-id;
description
"The identifier of the node. Can be represented as IP
address or dotted quad address.";
}
leaf type {
type enumeration {
enum ip {
description
"IP address representation of the node identifier.";
}
enum dotted-quad {
description
"Dotted quad address representation of the node
identifier.";
}
}
description
"Type of node identifier representation.";
}
}
grouping path-common-properties {
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"Common path attributes.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"TE path name.";
}
leaf path-computation-method {
type identityref {
base te-types:path-computation-method;
}
default "te-types:path-locally-computed";
description
"The method used for computing the path, either
locally computed, queried from a server or not
computed at all (explicitly configured).";
}
container path-computation-server {
when "derived-from-or-self(../path-computation-method, "
+ "'te-types:path-externally-queried')" {
description
"The path-computation server when the path is
externally queried.";
}
uses te-generic-node-id;
description
"Address of the external path computation
server.";
}
leaf compute-only {
type empty;
description
"When present, the path is computed and updated whenever
the topology is updated. No resources are committed
or reserved in the network.";
}
leaf use-path-computation {
when "derived-from-or-self(../path-computation-method, "
+ "'te-types:path-locally-computed')";
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"When 'true' indicates the path is dynamically computed
and/or validated against the Traffic-Engineering Database
(TED), and when 'false' indicates no path expansion or
validation against the TED is required.";
}
leaf lockdown {
type empty;
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"When present, indicates no reoptimization to be attempted
for this path.";
}
leaf path-scope {
type identityref {
base te-types:path-scope-type;
}
default "te-types:path-scope-end-to-end";
config false;
description
"Indicates whether the path is a segment or portion of
of the full path., or is the an end-to-end path for
the TE Tunnel.";
}
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping path-compute-info {
description
"Attributes used for path computation request.";
uses tunnel-associations-properties;
uses te-types:generic-path-optimization;
leaf named-path-constraint {
if-feature "te-types:named-path-constraints";
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:globals/te:named-path-constraints/"
+ "te:named-path-constraint/te:name";
}
description
"Reference to a globally defined named path constraint set.";
}
uses path-constraints-common;
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping path-forward-properties {
description
"The path preference.";
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
default "1";
description
"Specifies a preference for this path. The lower the number
higher the preference.";
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
leaf co-routed {
when "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:bidirectional = 'true'" {
description
"Applicable to bidirectional tunnels only.";
}
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"Indicates whether the reverse path must to be co-routed
with the primary.";
}
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping k-requested-paths {
description
"The k-shortest paths requests.";
leaf k-requested-paths {
type uint8;
default "1";
description
"The number of k-shortest-paths requested from the path
computation server and returned sorted by its optimization
objective.";
}
}
grouping path-state {
description
"TE per path state parameters.";
uses path-computation-response;
container lsp-provisioning-error-infos {
config false;
description
"LSP provisioning error information.";
list lsp-provisioning-error-info {
description
"List of LSP provisioning error info entries.";
leaf error-reason {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-provisioning-error-reason;
}
description
"LSP provision error type.";
}
leaf error-description {
type string;
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"The textual representation of the error occurred during
path computation.";
}
leaf error-timestamp {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Timestamp of when the reported error occurred.";
}
leaf error-node-id {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"Node identifier of node where error occurred.";
}
leaf error-link-id {
type te-types:te-tp-id;
description
"Link ID where the error occurred.";
}
leaf lsp-id {
type uint16;
description
"The LSP-ID for which path computation was performed.";
}
}
}
container lsps {
config false;
description
"The TE LSPs container.";
list lsp {
key "node lsp-id";
description
"List of LSPs associated with the tunnel.";
leaf tunnel-name {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps/te:lsp/te:tunnel-name";
}
description "TE tunnel name.";
}
leaf node {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps/te:lsp[tunnel-name="
+ "current()/../te:tunnel-name][lsp-id="
+ "current()/../te:lsp-id]/te:node";
}
description "The node where the LSP state resides on.";
}
leaf lsp-id {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:lsps/te:lsp[tunnel-name="
+ "current()/../tunnel-name]/te:lsp-id";
}
description "The TE LSP identifier.";
}
}
}
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping path-computation-response {
description
"Attributes reported by path computation response.";
container computed-paths-properties {
config false;
description
"Computed path properties container.";
list computed-path-properties {
key "k-index";
description
"List of computed paths.";
leaf k-index {
type uint8;
description
"The k-th path returned from the computation server.
A lower k value path is more optimal than higher k
value path(s)";
}
uses te-types:generic-path-properties {
augment "path-properties" {
description
"additional path properties returned by path
computation.";
uses te-types:te-bandwidth;
leaf disjointness-type {
type te-types:te-path-disjointness;
config false;
description
"The type of resource disjointness.
When reported for a primary path, it represents the
minimum level of disjointness of all the secondary
paths. When reported for a secondary path, it
represents the disjointness of the secondary path.";
}
}
}
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
container computed-path-error-infos {
config false;
description
"Path computation information container.";
list computed-path-error-info {
description
"List of path computation info entries.";
leaf error-description {
type string;
description
"Textual representation of the error occurred during
path computation.";
}
leaf error-timestamp {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Timestamp of last path computation attempt.";
}
leaf error-reason {
type identityref {
base te-types:path-computation-error-reason;
}
description
"Reason for the path computation error.";
}
}
}
}
grouping protection-restoration-properties {
description
"Protection and restoration parameters.";
container protection {
description
"Protection parameters.";
leaf protection-type {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-protection-type;
}
default "te-types:lsp-protection-unprotected";
description
"LSP protection type.";
}
leaf protection-reversion-disable {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"Disable protection reversion to working path.";
}
leaf hold-off-time {
type uint32;
units "milli-seconds";
description
"The time between the declaration of an SF or SD condition
and the initialization of the protection switching
algorithm.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf wait-to-revert {
type uint16;
units "seconds";
description
"Time to wait before attempting LSP reversion.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf aps-signal-id {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
default "1";
description
"The APS signal number used to reference the traffic of
this tunnel. The default value for normal traffic is 1.
The default value for extra-traffic is 255. If not
specified, non-default values can be assigned by the
server, if and only if, the server controls both
endpoints.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
}
container restoration {
description
"Restoration parameters.";
leaf restoration-type {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-restoration-type;
}
default "te-types:lsp-restoration-restore-none";
description
"LSP restoration type.";
}
leaf restoration-scheme {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
type identityref {
base te-types:restoration-scheme-type;
}
default "te-types:restoration-scheme-preconfigured";
description
"LSP restoration scheme.";
}
leaf restoration-reversion-disable {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"Disable restoration reversion to working path.";
}
leaf hold-off-time {
type uint32;
units "milli-seconds";
description
"The time between the declaration of an SF or SD condition
and the initialization of the protection switching
algorithm.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf wait-to-restore {
type uint16;
units "seconds";
description
"Time to wait before attempting LSP restoration.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf wait-to-revert {
type uint16;
units "seconds";
description
"Time to wait before attempting LSP reversion.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
}
}
grouping tunnel-associations-properties {
description
"TE tunnel association grouping.";
container association-objects {
description
"TE tunnel associations.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
list association-object {
key "association-key";
unique "type id source/id source/type";
description
"List of association base objects.";
reference
"RFC4872";
leaf association-key {
type string;
description
"Association key used to identify a specific
association in the list";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base te-types:association-type;
}
description
"Association type.";
reference
"RFC4872";
}
leaf id {
type uint16;
description
"Association identifier.";
reference
"RFC4872";
}
container source {
uses te-generic-node-id;
description
"Association source.";
reference
"RFC4872";
}
}
list association-object-extended {
key "association-key";
unique
"type id source/id source/type global-source extended-id";
description
"List of extended association objects.";
reference
"RFC6780";
leaf association-key {
type string;
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"Association key used to identify a specific
association in the list";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base te-types:association-type;
}
description
"Association type.";
reference
"RFC4872, RFC6780";
}
leaf id {
type uint16;
description
"Association identifier.";
reference
"RFC4872, RFC6780";
}
container source {
uses te-generic-node-id;
description
"Association source.";
reference
"RFC4872, RFC6780";
}
leaf global-source {
type uint32;
description
"Association global source.";
reference
"RFC6780";
}
leaf extended-id {
type yang:hex-string;
description
"Association extended identifier.";
reference
"RFC6780";
}
}
}
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping tunnel-common-attributes {
description
"Common grouping to define the TE tunnel parameters";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
leaf source {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"TE tunnel source node ID.";
}
leaf destination {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"TE tunnel destination node identifier.";
}
leaf src-tunnel-tp-id {
type binary;
description
"TE tunnel source termination point identifier.";
}
leaf dst-tunnel-tp-id {
type binary;
description
"TE tunnel destination termination point identifier.";
}
leaf bidirectional {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"Indicates a bidirectional co-routed LSP (non-associated
LSP case).";
}
}
/* This grouping is re-used in path-computation rpc */
grouping tunnel-hierarchy-properties {
description
"A grouping for TE tunnel hierarchy information.";
container hierarchy {
description
"Container for TE hierarchy related information.";
container dependency-tunnels {
description
"List of tunnels that this tunnel can be potentially
dependent on.";
list dependency-tunnel {
key "name";
description
"A tunnel entry that this tunnel can potentially depend
on.";
leaf name {
type leafref {
path "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:name";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
require-instance false;
}
description
"Dependency tunnel name. The tunnel may not have been
instantiated yet.";
}
uses te-types:encoding-and-switching-type;
}
}
container hierarchical-link {
description
"Identifies a hierarchical link (in client layer)
that this tunnel is associated with. By default, the
topology of the hierarchical link is the same topology of
the tunnel;";
reference
"RFC4206";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enables the hierarchical link properties supported by
this tunnel";
}
leaf local-te-node-id {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"The local TE node identifier.";
}
leaf local-te-link-tp-id {
type te-types:te-tp-id;
description
"The local TE link termination point identifier.";
}
leaf remote-te-node-id {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"Remote TE node identifier.";
}
uses te-types:te-topology-identifier {
description
"The topology identifier where the hierarchical link
supported by this TE tunnel is instantiated.";
}
}
}
}
grouping path-constraints-common {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"Global named path constraints configuration
grouping.";
uses te-types:common-path-constraints-attributes {
description
"The constraints applicable to the path. This includes:
- The path bandwidth constraint
- The path link protection type constraint
- The path setup/hold priority constraint
- path signaling type constraint
- path metric bounds constraint. The unit of path metric
bound is interpreted in the context of the metric-type.
For example for metric-type 'path-metric-loss', the bound
is multiples of the basic unit 0.000003% as described
in RFC7471 for OSPF, and RFC8570 for ISIS.
- path affinity constraints
- path SRLG constraints";
}
uses te-types:generic-path-disjointness;
uses te-types:path-constraints-route-objects;
container path-in-segment {
presence "The end-to-end tunnel starts in a previous domain;
this tunnel is a segment in the current domain.";
description
"If an end-to-end tunnel crosses multiple domains using
the same technology, some additional constraints have to be
taken in consideration in each domain.
This TE tunnel segment is stitched to the upstream TE tunnel
segment.";
uses te-types:label-set-info;
}
container path-out-segment {
presence
"The end-to-end tunnel is not terminated in this domain;
this tunnel is a segment in the current domain.";
description
"If an end-to-end tunnel crosses multiple domains using
the same technology, some additional constraints have to be
taken in consideration in each domain.
This TE tunnel segment is stitched to the downstream TE
tunnel segment.";
uses te-types:label-set-info;
}
}
/**
* TE container
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
*/
container te {
description
"TE global container.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"Enables the TE component features.";
}
/* TE Global Data */
container globals {
description
"Globals TE system-wide configuration data container.";
container named-admin-groups {
description
"TE named admin groups container.";
list named-admin-group {
if-feature "te-types:extended-admin-groups";
if-feature "te-types:named-extended-admin-groups";
key "name";
description
"List of named TE admin-groups.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"A string name that uniquely identifies a TE
interface named admin-group.";
}
leaf bit-position {
type uint32;
description
"Bit position representing the administrative group.";
reference
"RFC3209 and RFC7308";
}
}
}
container named-srlgs {
description
"TE named SRLGs container.";
list named-srlg {
if-feature "te-types:named-srlg-groups";
key "name";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"A list of named SRLG groups.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"A string name that uniquely identifies a TE
interface named SRLG.";
}
leaf value {
type te-types:srlg;
description
"An SRLG value.";
}
leaf cost {
type uint32;
description
"SRLG associated cost. Used during path to append
the path cost when traversing a link with this SRLG.";
}
}
}
container named-path-constraints {
description
"TE named path constraints container.";
list named-path-constraint {
if-feature "te-types:named-path-constraints";
key "name";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"A string name that uniquely identifies a
path constraint set.";
}
uses path-constraints-common;
description
"A list of named path constraints.";
}
}
}
/* TE Tunnel Data */
container tunnels {
description
"Tunnels TE configuration data container.";
list tunnel {
key "name";
description
"The list of TE tunnels.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
leaf name {
type string;
description
"TE tunnel name.";
}
leaf alias {
type string;
description
"An alternate name of the TE tunnel that can be modified
anytime during its lifetime.";
}
leaf identifier {
type uint32;
description
"TE tunnel Identifier.";
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf color {
type uint32;
description "The color associated with the TE tunnel.";
reference "RFC9012";
}
leaf description {
type string;
default "None";
description
"Textual description for this TE tunnel.";
}
leaf admin-state {
type identityref {
base te-types:tunnel-admin-state-type;
}
default "te-types:tunnel-admin-state-up";
description
"TE tunnel administrative state.";
}
leaf operational-state {
type identityref {
base te-types:tunnel-state-type;
}
config false;
description
"TE tunnel operational state.";
}
uses te-types:encoding-and-switching-type;
uses tunnel-common-attributes;
container controller {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"Contains tunnel data relevant to external controller(s).
This target node may be augmented by external module(s),
for example, to add data for PCEP initiated and/or
delegated tunnels.";
leaf protocol-origin {
type identityref {
base te-types:protocol-origin-type;
}
description
"The protocol origin for instantiating the tunnel.";
}
leaf controller-entity-id {
type string;
description
"An identifier unique within the scope of visibility
that associated with the entity that controls the
tunnel.";
reference "RFC8232";
}
}
leaf reoptimize-timer {
type uint16;
units "seconds";
description
"Frequency of reoptimization of a traffic engineered
LSP.";
}
uses tunnel-associations-properties;
uses protection-restoration-properties;
uses te-types:tunnel-constraints;
uses tunnel-hierarchy-properties;
container primary-paths {
description
"The set of primary paths.";
reference "RFC4872";
list primary-path {
key "name";
description
"List of primary paths for this tunnel.";
uses path-common-properties;
uses path-forward-properties;
uses k-requested-paths;
uses path-compute-info;
uses path-state;
container primary-reverse-path {
when "../../../te:bidirectional = 'false'";
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"The reverse primary path properties.";
uses path-common-properties;
uses path-compute-info;
uses path-state;
container candidate-secondary-reverse-paths {
when "../../../../te:bidirectional = 'false'";
description
"The set of referenced candidate reverse secondary
paths from the full set of secondary reverse paths
which may be used for this primary path.";
list candidate-secondary-reverse-path {
key "secondary-path";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of candidate secondary reverse path(s)";
leaf secondary-path {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../../"
+ "te:secondary-reverse-paths/"
+ "te:secondary-reverse-path/te:name";
}
description
"A reference to the secondary reverse path that
should be utilised when the containing primary
reverse path option is in use.";
}
}
}
}
container candidate-secondary-paths {
description
"The set of candidate secondary paths which may be
used for this primary path. When secondary paths are
specified in the list the path of the secondary LSP
in use must be restricted to those path options
referenced.
The priority of the secondary paths is specified
within the list. Higher priority values are less
preferred - that is to say that a path with priority
0 is the most preferred path. In the case that the
list is empty, any secondary path option may be
utilised when the current primary path is in use.";
list candidate-secondary-path {
key "secondary-path";
ordered-by user;
description
"List of candidate secondary paths for this
tunnel.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
leaf secondary-path {
type leafref {
path "../../../../../te:secondary-paths/"
+ "te:secondary-path/te:name";
}
description
"A reference to the secondary path that should be
utilised when the containing primary path option
is
in use.";
}
leaf active {
type boolean;
config false;
description
"Indicates the current active path option that
has been selected of the candidate secondary
paths.";
}
}
}
}
}
container secondary-paths {
description
"The set of secondary paths.";
reference "RFC4872";
list secondary-path {
key "name";
description
"List of secondary paths for this tunnel.";
uses path-common-properties;
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
default "1";
description
"Specifies a preference for this path. The lower the
number higher the preference.";
}
uses path-compute-info;
uses protection-restoration-properties;
uses path-state;
}
}
container secondary-reverse-paths {
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"The set of secondary reverse paths.";
list secondary-reverse-path {
key "name";
description
"List of secondary paths for this tunnel.";
uses path-common-properties;
leaf preference {
type uint8 {
range "1..255";
}
default "1";
description
"Specifies a preference for this path. The lower the
number higher the preference. Paths that have the
same preference will be activated together.";
}
uses path-compute-info;
uses protection-restoration-properties;
uses path-state;
}
}
action tunnel-action {
description
"Tunnel action.";
input {
leaf action-type {
type identityref {
base te-types:tunnel-action-type;
}
description
"Tunnel action type.";
}
}
output {
leaf action-result {
type identityref {
base te-types:te-action-result;
}
description
"The result of the tunnel action operation.";
}
}
}
action protection-external-commands {
input {
leaf protection-external-command {
type identityref {
base te-types:protection-external-commands;
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
description
"Protection external command.";
}
leaf protection-group-ingress-node {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"When 'true', indicates that the action is
applied on ingress node.
By default, the action applies to the ingress node
only.";
}
leaf protection-group-egress-node {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"When set to 'true', indicates that the action is
applied on egress node.
By default, the action applies to the ingress node
only.";
}
leaf path-name {
type string;
description
"The name of the path that the external command
applies to.";
}
leaf path-type {
type te-types:path-type;
description
"The type of the path that the external command
applies to.";
}
leaf traffic-type {
type enumeration {
enum normal-traffic {
description
"The manual-switch or forced-switch command
applies to the normal traffic (this Tunnel).";
}
enum null-traffic {
description
"The manual-switch or forced-switch command
applies to the null traffic.";
}
enum extra-traffic {
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"The manual-switch or forced-switch command
applies to the extra traffic (the extra-traffic
Tunnel sharing protection bandwidth with this
Tunnel).";
}
}
description
"Indicates whether the manual-switch or forced-switch
commands applies to the normal traffic, the null
traffic or the extra-traffic.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf extra-traffic-tunnel-ref {
type tunnel-ref;
description
"In case there are multiple extra-traffic tunnels
sharing protection bandwidth with this Tunnel
(m:n protection), represents which extra-traffic
Tunnel the manual-switch or forced-switch to
extra-traffic command applies to.";
}
}
}
}
}
/* TE LSPs Data */
container lsps {
config false;
description
"TE LSPs state container.";
list lsp {
key "tunnel-name lsp-id node";
unique "source destination tunnel-id lsp-id "
+ "extended-tunnel-id";
description
"List of LSPs associated with the tunnel.";
leaf tunnel-name {
type string;
description "The TE tunnel name.";
}
leaf lsp-id {
type uint16;
description
"Identifier used in the SENDER_TEMPLATE and the
FILTER_SPEC that can be changed to allow a sender to
share resources with itself.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf node {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"The node where the TE LSP state resides on.";
}
leaf source {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"Tunnel sender address extracted from
SENDER_TEMPLATE object.";
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf destination {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"The tunnel endpoint address.";
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf tunnel-id {
type uint16;
description
"The tunnel identifier that remains
constant over the life of the tunnel.";
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf extended-tunnel-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description
"The LSP Extended Tunnel ID.";
reference
"RFC3209";
}
leaf operational-state {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-state-type;
}
description
"The LSP operational state.";
}
leaf signaling-type {
type identityref {
base te-types:path-signaling-type;
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
description
"The signaling protocol used to set up this LSP.";
}
leaf origin-type {
type enumeration {
enum ingress {
description
"Origin ingress.";
}
enum egress {
description
"Origin egress.";
}
enum transit {
description
"Origin transit.";
}
}
description
"The origin of the LSP relative to the location of the
local switch in the path.";
}
leaf lsp-resource-status {
type enumeration {
enum primary {
description
"A primary LSP is a fully established LSP for which
the resource allocation has been committed at the
data plane.";
}
enum secondary {
description
"A secondary LSP is an LSP that has been provisioned
in the control plane only; e.g. resource allocation
has not been committed at the data plane.";
}
}
description
"LSP resource allocation state.";
reference
"RFC4872, section 4.2.1";
}
leaf lockout-of-normal {
type boolean;
description
"When set to 'true', it represents a lockout of normal
traffic external command. When set to 'false', it
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
represents a clear lockout of normal traffic external
command. The lockout of normal traffic command applies
to this Tunnel.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf freeze {
type boolean;
description
"When set to 'true', it represents a freeze external
command. When set to 'false', it represents a clear
freeze external command. The freeze command applies to
all the Tunnels which are sharing the protection
resources with this Tunnel.";
reference
"RFC4427";
}
leaf lsp-protection-role {
type enumeration {
enum working {
description
"A working LSP must be a primary LSP whilst a
protecting LSP can be either a primary or a
secondary LSP. Also, known as protected LSPs when
working LSPs are associated with protecting LSPs.";
}
enum protecting {
description
"A secondary LSP is an LSP that has been provisioned
in the control plane only; e.g. resource allocation
has not been committed at the data plane.";
}
}
description
"LSP role type.";
reference
"RFC4872, section 4.2.1";
}
leaf lsp-protection-state {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-protection-state;
}
description
"The APS state machine controlling which
tunnels are using the resources of the protecting LSP.";
reference
"ITU_G.808.1, RFC7271, and RFC8234";
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
leaf protection-group-ingress-node-id {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"Indicates the te-node-id of the protection group
ingress node when the APS state represents an external
command (LoP, SF, MS) applied to it or a WTR timer
running on it. If the external command is not applied to
the ingress node or the WTR timer is not running on it,
this attribute is not specified. A value 0.0.0.0 is used
when the te-node-id of the protection group ingress node
is unknown (e.g., because the ingress node is outside
the scope of control of the server)";
}
leaf protection-group-egress-node-id {
type te-types:te-node-id;
description
"Indicates the te-node-id of the protection group egress
node when the APS state represents an external command
(LoP, SF, MS) applied to it or a WTR timer running on
it. If the external command is not applied to the
ingress node or the WTR timer is not running on it, this
attribute is not specified. A value 0.0.0.0 is used when
the te-node-id of the protection group ingress node is
unknown (e.g., because the ingress node is outside the
scope of control of the server)";
}
container lsp-actual-route-information {
description
"RSVP recorded route object information.";
list lsp-actual-route-information {
when "../../origin-type = 'ingress'" {
description
"Applicable on ingress LSPs only.";
}
key "index";
description
"Record route list entry.";
uses te-types:record-route-state;
}
}
}
}
}
/* TE Tunnel RPCs/execution Data */
rpc tunnels-path-compute {
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"TE tunnels RPC nodes.";
input {
container path-compute-info {
/*
* An external path compute module may augment this
* target.
*/
description
"RPC input information.";
}
}
output {
container path-compute-result {
/*
* An external path compute module may augment this
* target.
*/
description
"RPC output information.";
}
}
}
rpc tunnels-actions {
description
"TE tunnels actions RPC";
input {
container tunnel-info {
description
"TE tunnel information.";
choice filter-type {
mandatory true;
description
"Filter choice.";
case all-tunnels {
leaf all {
type empty;
mandatory true;
description
"When present, applies the action on all TE
tunnels.";
}
}
case one-tunnel {
leaf tunnel {
type tunnel-ref;
description
"Apply action on the specific TE tunnel.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
}
}
}
container action-info {
description
"TE tunnel action information.";
leaf action {
type identityref {
base te-types:tunnel-action-type;
}
description
"The action type.";
}
leaf disruptive {
when "derived-from-or-self(../action, "
+ "'te-types:tunnel-action-reoptimize')";
type empty;
description
"When present, specifies whether or not the
reoptimization
action is allowed to be disruptive.";
}
}
}
output {
leaf action-result {
type identityref {
base te-types:te-action-result;
}
description
"The result of the tunnel action operation.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 7: TE Tunnel data model YANG module
6. TE Device YANG Model
The device TE YANG module ('ietf-te-device') models data that is
specific to managing a TE device. This module augments the generic
TE YANG module.
6.1. Module Structure
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
6.1.1. TE Interfaces
This branch of the model manages TE interfaces that are present on a
device. Examples of TE interface properties are:
* Maximum reservable bandwidth, bandwidth constraints (BC)
* Flooding parameters
- Flooding intervals and threshold values
* Interface attributes
- (Extended) administrative groups
- SRLG values
- TE metric value
* Fast reroute backup tunnel properties (such as static, auto-
tunnel)
The derived state associated with interfaces is grouped under the
interface "state" sub-container as shown in Figure 8. This covers
state data such as:
* Bandwidth information: maximum bandwidth, available bandwidth at
different priorities and for each class-type (CT)
* List of admitted LSPs
- Name, bandwidth value and pool, time, priority
* Statistics: state counters, flooding counters, admission counters
(accepted/rejected), preemption counters
* Adjacency information
- Neighbor address
- Metric value
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
module: ietf-te-device
augment /te:te:
+--rw interfaces
.
+-- rw te-dev:te-attributes
<<intended configuration>>
.
+-- ro state
<<derived state associated with the TE interface>>
Figure 8: TE interface state YANG subtree
6.2. Tree Diagram
Figure 9 shows the tree diagram of the device TE YANG model defined
in modules 'ietf-te-device.yang'.
module: ietf-te-device
augment /te:te:
+--rw interfaces
+--rw threshold-type? enumeration
+--rw delta-percentage? rt-types:percentage
+--rw threshold-specification? enumeration
+--rw up-thresholds* rt-types:percentage
+--rw down-thresholds* rt-types:percentage
+--rw up-down-thresholds* rt-types:percentage
+--rw interface* [interface]
+--rw interface if:interface-ref
+--rw te-metric?
| te-types:te-metric
+--rw (admin-group-type)?
| +--:(value-admin-groups)
| | +--rw (value-admin-group-type)?
| | +--:(admin-groups)
| | | +--rw admin-group?
| | | te-types:admin-group
| | +--:(extended-admin-groups)
| | {te-types:extended-admin-groups}?
| | +--rw extended-admin-group?
| | te-types:extended-admin-group
| +--:(named-admin-groups)
| +--rw named-admin-groups* [named-admin-group]
| {te-types:extended-admin-groups,
| te-types:named-extended-admin-groups}?
| +--rw named-admin-group leafref
+--rw (srlg-type)?
| +--:(value-srlgs)
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| | +--rw values* [value]
| | +--rw value uint32
| +--:(named-srlgs)
| +--rw named-srlgs* [named-srlg]
| {te-types:named-srlg-groups}?
| +--rw named-srlg leafref
+--rw threshold-type? enumeration
+--rw delta-percentage?
| rt-types:percentage
+--rw threshold-specification? enumeration
+--rw up-thresholds*
| rt-types:percentage
+--rw down-thresholds*
| rt-types:percentage
+--rw up-down-thresholds*
| rt-types:percentage
+--rw switching-capabilities* [switching-capability]
| +--rw switching-capability identityref
| +--rw encoding? identityref
+--ro te-advertisements-state
+--ro flood-interval? uint32
+--ro last-flooded-time? uint32
+--ro next-flooded-time? uint32
+--ro last-flooded-trigger? enumeration
+--ro advertised-level-areas* [level-area]
+--ro level-area uint32
augment /te:te/te:globals:
+--rw lsp-install-interval? uint32
+--rw lsp-cleanup-interval? uint32
+--rw lsp-invalidation-interval? uint32
augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel:
+--rw path-invalidation-action? identityref
+--rw lsp-install-interval? uint32
+--rw lsp-cleanup-interval? uint32
+--rw lsp-invalidation-interval? uint32
augment /te:te/te:lsps/te:lsp:
+--ro lsp-timers
| +--ro uptime? uint32
| +--ro time-to-install? uint32
| +--ro time-to-destroy? uint32
+--ro downstream-info
| +--ro nhop? te-types:te-tp-id
| +--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| +--ro neighbor
| | +--ro id? te-gen-node-id
| | +--ro type? enumeration
| +--ro label? rt-types:generalized-label
+--ro upstream-info
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
+--ro phop? te-types:te-tp-id
+--ro neighbor
| +--ro id? te-gen-node-id
| +--ro type? enumeration
+--ro label? rt-types:generalized-label
rpcs:
+---x link-state-update
+---w input
+---w (filter-type)
+--:(match-all)
| +---w all empty
+--:(match-one-interface)
+---w interface? if:interface-ref
Figure 9: TE Tunnel device model YANG tree diagram
6.3. YANG Module
The device TE YANG module 'ietf-te-device' imports the following
module(s):
* ietf-interfaces defined in [RFC8343]
* ietf-routing-types defined in [RFC8294]
* ietf-te-types defined in [RFC8776]
* ietf-te defined in this document
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-te-device@2023-03-11.yang"
module ietf-te-device {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-device";
/* Replace with IANA when assigned */
prefix te-dev;
/* Import TE module */
import ietf-te {
prefix te;
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering
Tunnels and Interfaces";
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
/* Import TE types */
import ietf-te-types {
prefix te-types;
reference
"RFC8776: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering.";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix if;
reference
"RFC8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix rt-types;
reference
"RFC8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
organization
"IETF Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS)
Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
WG List: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Editor: Tarek Saad
<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Editor: Rakesh Gandhi
<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>
Editor: Himanshu Shah
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Igor Bryskin
<mailto:i_bryskin@yahoo.com>";
description
"This module defines a data model for TE device configurations,
state, and RPCs. The model fully conforms to the
Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this
// note.
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and remove this note.
revision 2023-03-11 {
description
"Initial revision for the TE device YANG module.";
reference
"RFCXXXX: A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels
and Interfaces";
}
grouping lsp-device-timers {
description
"Device TE LSP timers configs.";
leaf lsp-install-interval {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"TE LSP installation delay time.";
}
leaf lsp-cleanup-interval {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"TE LSP cleanup delay time.";
}
leaf lsp-invalidation-interval {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"TE LSP path invalidation before taking action delay time.";
}
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
grouping te-igp-flooding-bandwidth-config {
description
"Configurable items for igp flooding bandwidth
threshold configuration.";
leaf threshold-type {
type enumeration {
enum delta {
description
"'delta' indicates that the local
system should flood IGP updates when a
change in reserved bandwidth >= the specified
delta occurs on the interface.";
}
enum threshold-crossed {
description
"THRESHOLD-CROSSED indicates that
the local system should trigger an update (and
hence flood) the reserved bandwidth when the
reserved bandwidth changes such that it crosses,
or becomes equal to one of the threshold values.";
}
}
description
"The type of threshold that should be used to specify the
values at which bandwidth is flooded. 'delta' indicates that
the local system should flood IGP updates when a change in
reserved bandwidth >= the specified delta occurs on the
interface. Where 'threshold-crossed' is specified, the local
system should trigger an update (and hence flood) the
reserved bandwidth when the reserved bandwidth changes such
that it crosses, or becomes equal to one of the threshold
values.";
}
leaf delta-percentage {
when "../threshold-type = 'delta'" {
description
"The percentage delta can only be specified when the
threshold type is specified to be a percentage delta of
the reserved bandwidth.";
}
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"The percentage of the maximum-reservable-bandwidth
considered as the delta that results in an IGP update
being flooded.";
}
leaf threshold-specification {
when "../threshold-type = 'threshold-crossed'" {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"The selection of whether mirrored or separate threshold
values are to be used requires user specified thresholds
to be set.";
}
type enumeration {
enum mirrored-up-down {
description
"mirrored-up-down indicates that a single set of
threshold values should be used for both increasing
and decreasing bandwidth when determining whether
to trigger updated bandwidth values to be flooded
in the IGP TE extensions.";
}
enum separate-up-down {
description
"separate-up-down indicates that a separate
threshold values should be used for the increasing
and decreasing bandwidth when determining whether
to trigger updated bandwidth values to be flooded
in the IGP TE extensions.";
}
}
description
"This value specifies whether a single set of threshold
values should be used for both increasing and decreasing
bandwidth when determining whether to trigger updated
bandwidth values to be flooded in the IGP TE extensions.
'mirrored-up-down' indicates that a single value (or set of
values) should be used for both increasing and decreasing
values, where 'separate-up-down' specifies that the
increasing and decreasing values will be separately
specified.";
}
leaf-list up-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'threshold-crossed'"
+ "and ../threshold-specification = 'separate-up-down'" {
description
"A list of up-thresholds can only be specified when the
bandwidth update is triggered based on crossing a
threshold and separate up and down thresholds are
required.";
}
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth) at which bandwidth updates are to be
triggered when the bandwidth is increasing.";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
leaf-list down-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'threshold-crossed'"
+ "and ../threshold-specification = 'separate-up-down'" {
description
"A list of down-thresholds can only be specified when the
bandwidth update is triggered based on crossing a
threshold and separate up and down thresholds are
required.";
}
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth) at which bandwidth updates are to be
triggered when the bandwidth is decreasing.";
}
leaf-list up-down-thresholds {
when "../threshold-type = 'threshold-crossed'"
+ "and ../threshold-specification = 'mirrored-up-down'" {
description
"A list of thresholds corresponding to both increasing
and decreasing bandwidths can be specified only when an
update is triggered based on crossing a threshold, and
the same up and down thresholds are required.";
}
type rt-types:percentage;
description
"The thresholds (expressed as a percentage of the maximum
reservable bandwidth of the interface) at which bandwidth
updates are flooded - used both when the bandwidth is
increasing and decreasing.";
}
}
/**
* TE device augmentations
*/
augment "/te:te" {
description
"TE global container.";
/* TE Interface Configuration Data */
container interfaces {
description
"Configuration data model for TE interfaces.";
uses te-igp-flooding-bandwidth-config;
list interface {
key "interface";
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"TE interfaces.";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"TE interface name.";
}
/* TE interface parameters */
leaf te-metric {
type te-types:te-metric;
description
"TE interface metric.";
}
choice admin-group-type {
description
"TE interface administrative groups
representation type.";
case value-admin-groups {
choice value-admin-group-type {
description
"choice of admin-groups.";
case admin-groups {
description
"Administrative group/Resource
class/Color.";
leaf admin-group {
type te-types:admin-group;
description
"TE interface administrative group.";
}
}
case extended-admin-groups {
if-feature "te-types:extended-admin-groups";
description
"Extended administrative group/Resource
class/Color.";
leaf extended-admin-group {
type te-types:extended-admin-group;
description
"TE interface extended administrative group.";
}
}
}
}
case named-admin-groups {
list named-admin-groups {
if-feature "te-types:extended-admin-groups";
if-feature "te-types:named-extended-admin-groups";
key "named-admin-group";
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
description
"A list of named admin-group entries.";
leaf named-admin-group {
type leafref {
path "../../../../te:globals/"
+ "te:named-admin-groups/te:named-admin-group/"
+ "te:name";
}
description
"A named admin-group entry.";
}
}
}
}
choice srlg-type {
description
"Choice of SRLG configuration.";
case value-srlgs {
list values {
key "value";
description
"List of SRLG values that
this link is part of.";
leaf value {
type uint32 {
range "0..4294967295";
}
description
"Value of the SRLG";
}
}
}
case named-srlgs {
list named-srlgs {
if-feature "te-types:named-srlg-groups";
key "named-srlg";
description
"A list of named SRLG entries.";
leaf named-srlg {
type leafref {
path "../../../../te:globals/"
+ "te:named-srlgs/te:named-srlg/te:name";
}
description
"A named SRLG entry.";
}
}
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
uses te-igp-flooding-bandwidth-config;
list switching-capabilities {
key "switching-capability";
description
"List of interface capabilities for this interface.";
leaf switching-capability {
type identityref {
base te-types:switching-capabilities;
}
description
"Switching Capability for this interface.";
}
leaf encoding {
type identityref {
base te-types:lsp-encoding-types;
}
description
"Encoding supported by this interface.";
}
}
container te-advertisements-state {
config false;
description
"TE interface advertisements state container.";
leaf flood-interval {
type uint32;
description
"The periodic flooding interval.";
}
leaf last-flooded-time {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"Time elapsed since last flooding in seconds.";
}
leaf next-flooded-time {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"Time remained for next flooding in seconds.";
}
leaf last-flooded-trigger {
type enumeration {
enum link-up {
description
"Link-up flooding trigger.";
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
enum link-down {
description
"Link-down flooding trigger.";
}
enum threshold-up {
description
"Bandwidth reservation up threshold.";
}
enum threshold-down {
description
"Bandwidth reservation down threshold.";
}
enum bandwidth-change {
description
"Bandwidth capacity change.";
}
enum user-initiated {
description
"Initiated by user.";
}
enum srlg-change {
description
"SRLG property change.";
}
enum periodic-timer {
description
"Periodic timer expired.";
}
}
default "periodic-timer";
description
"Trigger for the last flood.";
}
list advertised-level-areas {
key "level-area";
description
"List of level-areas that the TE interface is
advertised in.";
leaf level-area {
type uint32;
description
"The IGP area or level where the TE interface link
state is advertised in.";
}
}
}
}
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
/* TE globals device augmentation */
augment "/te:te/te:globals" {
description
"Global TE device specific configuration parameters.";
uses lsp-device-timers;
}
/* TE tunnels device configuration augmentation */
augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel" {
description
"Tunnel device dependent augmentation.";
leaf path-invalidation-action {
type identityref {
base te-types:path-invalidation-action-type;
}
description
"Tunnel path invalidation action.";
}
uses lsp-device-timers;
}
/* TE LSPs device state augmentation */
augment "/te:te/te:lsps/te:lsp" {
description
"TE LSP device dependent augmentation.";
container lsp-timers {
when "../te:origin-type = 'ingress'" {
description
"Applicable to ingress LSPs only.";
}
description
"Ingress LSP timers.";
leaf uptime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"The LSP uptime.";
}
leaf time-to-install {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"The time remaining for a new LSP to be instantiated
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
in forwarding to carry traffic.";
}
leaf time-to-destroy {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"The time remaining for a existing LSP to be deleted
from forwarding.";
}
}
container downstream-info {
when "../te:origin-type != 'egress'" {
description
"Downstream information of the LSP.";
}
description
"downstream information.";
leaf nhop {
type te-types:te-tp-id;
description
"downstream next-hop address.";
}
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"downstream interface.";
}
container neighbor {
uses te:te-generic-node-id;
description
"downstream neighbor address.";
}
leaf label {
type rt-types:generalized-label;
description
"downstream label.";
}
}
container upstream-info {
when "../te:origin-type != 'ingress'" {
description
"Upstream information of the LSP.";
}
description
"upstream information.";
leaf phop {
type te-types:te-tp-id;
description
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"upstream next-hop or previous-hop address.";
}
container neighbor {
uses te:te-generic-node-id;
description
"upstream neighbor address.";
}
leaf label {
type rt-types:generalized-label;
description
"upstream label.";
}
}
}
/* TE interfaces RPCs/execution Data */
rpc link-state-update {
description
"Triggers a link state update for the specific interface.";
input {
choice filter-type {
mandatory true;
description
"Filter choice.";
case match-all {
leaf all {
type empty;
mandatory true;
description
"Match all TE interfaces.";
}
}
case match-one-interface {
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Match a specific TE interface.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 10: TE device data model YANG module
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
7. Notifications
Notifications are a key component of any topology data model.
[RFC8639] and [RFC8641] define a subscription mechanism and a push
mechanism for YANG datastores. These mechanisms currently allow the
user to:
* Subscribe to notifications on a per-client basis.
* Specify subtree filters or XML Path Language (XPath) filters so
that only contents of interest will be sent.
* Specify either periodic or on-demand notifications.
8. IANA Considerations
This document registers the following URIs in the IETF XML registry
[RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following
registrations are requested to be made.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-device
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers two YANG modules in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
Name: ietf-te
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te
Prefix: te
Reference: RFCXXXX
Name: ietf-te-device
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-device
Prefix: te-device
Reference: RFCXXXX
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 72]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
9. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
"/te/globals": This module specifies the global TE configurations on
a device. Unauthorized access to this container could cause the
device to ignore packets it should receive and process.
"/te/tunnels": This list specifies the configuration and state of TE
Tunnels present on the device or controller. Unauthorized access to
this list could cause the device to ignore packets it should receive
and process. An attacker may also use state to derive information
about the network topology, and subsequently orchestrate further
attacks.
"/te/interfaces": This list specifies the configuration and state TE
interfaces on a device. Unauthorized access to this list could cause
the device to ignore packets it should receive and process.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
"/te/lsps": this list contains information state about established
LSPs in the network. An attacker can use this information to derive
information about the network topology, and subsequently orchestrate
further attacks.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 73]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
Some of the RPC operations in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control access to these operations. These are the
operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
"/te/tunnels-actions": using this RPC, an attacker can modify
existing paths that may be carrying live traffic, and hence result to
interruption to services carried over the network.
"/te/tunnels-path-compute": using this RPC, an attacker can retrieve
secured information about the network provider which can be used to
orchestrate further attacks.
The security considerations spelled out in the YANG 1.1 specification
[RFC7950] apply for this document as well.
10. Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the members of the multi-vendor YANG
design team who are involved in the definition of this model.
The authors would like to thank Tom Petch and Adrian Farrel for
reviewing and providing useful feedback about the document. The
authors would also like to thank Loa Andersson, Lou Berger, Sergio
Belotti, Italo Busi, Carlo Perocchio, Francesco Lazzeri, Aihua Guo,
Dhruv Dhody, and Raqib Jones for providing feedback on this document.
11. Contributors
Himanshu Shah
Ciena
Email: hshah@ciena.com
Xia Chen
Huawei Technologies
Email: jescia.chenxia@huawei.com
Bin Wen
Comcast
Email: Bin_Wen@cable.comcast.com
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 74]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
12. Appendix A: Data Tree Examples
This section contains examples of use of the model with RESTCONF
[RFC8040] and JSON encoding.
For the example we will use a 4 node MPLS network were RSVP-TE MPLS
Tunnels can be setup. The loopbacks of each router are shown. The
network in Figure 11 will be used in the examples described in the
following sections.
192.0.2.1 192.0.2.2 192.0.2.4
+-------+ +-------+ +-------+
| | | | | |
| A +--------+ B +------+ D |
+---+---+ +-------+ +---+---+
| |
| +-------+ |
| | | |
+------------+ C +----------+
| |
+-------+
192.0.2.3
Figure 11: TE network used in data tree examples
12.1. Basic Tunnel Setup
This example uses the TE Tunnel YANG data model defined in this
document to create an RSVP-TE signaled Tunnel of packet LSP encoding
type. First, the TE Tunnel is created with no specific restrictions
or constraints (e.g., protection or restoration). The TE Tunnel
ingresses on router A and egresses on router D.
In this case, the TE Tunnel is created without specifying additional
information about the primary paths.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 75]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
POST /restconf/data/ietf-te:te/tunnels HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Accept: application/yang-data+json
Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
{
"ietf-te:tunnel": [
{
"name": "Example_LSP_Tunnel_A_2",
"encoding": "te-types:lsp-encoding-packet",
"admin-state": "te-types:tunnel-state-up",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.4",
"bidirectional": "false",
"signaling-type": "te-types:path-setup-rsvp"
}
]
}
12.2. Global Named Path Constraints
This example uses the YANG data model to create a 'named path
constraint' that can be reference by TE Tunnels. The path
constraint, in this case, limits the TE Tunnel hops for the computed
path.
POST /restconf/data/ietf-te:te/globals/named-path-constraints
HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Accept: application/yang-data+json
Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
"ietf-te:named-path-constraint": {
"name": "max-hop-3",
"path-metric-bounds": {
"path-metric-bound": {
"metric-type": "te-types:path-metric-hop",
"upper-bound": "3"
}
}
}
}
12.3. Tunnel with Global Path Constraint
In this example, the previously created 'named path constraint' is
applied to the TE Tunnel created in Section 12.1.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 76]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
POST /restconf/data/ietf-te:te/tunnels HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Accept: application/yang-data+json
Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
{
"ietf-te:ietf-tunnel": [
{
"name": "Example_LSP_Tunnel_A_4_1",
"encoding": "te-types:lsp-encoding-packet",
"description": "Simple_LSP_with_named_path",
"admin-state": "te-types:tunnel-state-up",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.4",
"signaling-type": "path-setup-rsvp",
"primary-paths": [
{
"primary-path": {
"name": "Simple_LSP_1",
"use-path-computation": "true",
"named-path-constraint": "max-hop-3"
}
}
]
}
]
}
12.4. Tunnel with Per-tunnel Path Constraint
In this example, the a per tunnel path constraint is explicitly
indicated under the TE Tunnel created in Section 12.1 to constrain
the computed path for the tunnel.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 77]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
POST /restconf/data/ietf-te:te/tunnels HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Accept: application/yang-data+json
Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
{
"ietf-te:tunnel": [
{
"name": "Example_LSP_Tunnel_A_4_2",
"encoding": "te-types:lsp-encoding-packet",
"admin-state": "te-types:tunnel-state-up",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.4",
"signaling-type": "te-types:path-setup-rsvp",
"primary-paths": {
"primary-path": [
{
"name": "path1",
"path-metric-bounds": {
"path-metric-bound": [
{
"metric-type": "te-types:path-metric-hop",
"upper-bound": "3"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
12.5. Tunnel State
In this example, the 'GET' query is sent to return the state stored
about the tunnel.
GET /restconf/data/ietf-te:te/tunnels +
/tunnel="Example_LSP_Tunnel_A_4_1"
/p2p-primary-paths/ HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Accept: application/yang-data+json
The request, with status code 200 would include, for example, the
following json:
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 78]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
{
"ietf-te:primary-paths": {
"primary-path": [
{
"name": "path1",
"path-computation-method": "te-types:path-locally-computed",
"computed-paths-properties": {
"computed-path-properties": [
{
"k-index": "1",
"path-properties": {
"path-route-objects": {
"path-route-object": [
{
"index": "1",
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2"
}
},
{
"index": "2",
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.4"
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
},
"lsps": {
"lsp": [
{
"tunnel-name": "Example_LSP_Tunnel_A_4_1",
"node": "192.0.2.1 ",
"lsp-id": "25356"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
12.6. Example TE Tunnel with Primary and Secondary Paths
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 79]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
+----------+ +----------+
+-|192.0.2.9 |---+ |192.0.2.10|
| +----------+ | +----------+
| | | |
+----------+ +----------+ +----------+ | |
|192.0.2.8 |----|192.0.2.3 |-----|192.0.2.4 |----+ |
+----------+ +----------+ +----------+ |
| | | |
+----------+ | | |
|192.0.2.1 |---------+ | +----------+
+----------+ +-----------|192.0.2.5 |
| | +----------+
| | +----------+ | |
| +--------------|192.0.2.2 |---------------------+ |
| +----------+ |
| | | |
+----------+ | | +----------+
|192.0.2.6 |----------------+ +-------------------|192.0.2.7 |
+----------+ +----------+
Figure 12: TE network used in data tree examples
Below is the state retrieved for a TE tunnel from source 192.0.2.1 to
192.0.2.5 with primary, secondary, reverse, and secondary reverse
paths as shown in Figure 12.
{
"ietf-te:te": {
"tunnels": {
"tunnel": [
{
"name": "example-1",
"description": "Example in slide 1",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.5",
"bidirectional": false,
"primary-paths": {
"primary-path": [
{
"name": "primary-1 (fwd)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 80]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
]
},
"primary-reverse-path": {
"name": "primary-2 (rev)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.3",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
},
"candidate-secondary-reverse-paths": {
"candidate-secondary-reverse-path": [
"secondary-3 (rev)",
"secondary-4 (rev)",
"secondary-5 (rev)"
]
}
},
"candidate-secondary-paths": {
"candidate-secondary-path": [
"secondary-1 (fwd)",
"secondary-2 (fwd)"
]
}
}
]
},
"secondary-paths": {
"secondary-path": [
{
"name": "secondary-1 (fwd)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.1"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 81]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "secondary-2 (fwd)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.5",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"secondary-reverse-paths": {
"secondary-reverse-path": [
{
"name": "secondary-3 (rev)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.5"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.4",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 82]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
]
}
},
{
"name": "secondary-4 (rev)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.4"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.3",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "secondary-5 (rev)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.3"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.1",
"hop-type":"loose"
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "example-3",
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 83]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"description": "Example in slide 3",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.5",
"bidirectional": true,
"primary-paths": {
"primary-path": [
{
"name": "primary-1 (bidir)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
},
"candidate-secondary-paths": {
"candidate-secondary-path": [
"secondary-1 (bidir)",
"secondary-2 (bidir)"
]
}
}
]
},
"secondary-paths": {
"secondary-path": [
{
"name": "secondary-1 (bidir)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.1"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 84]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
}
},
{
"name": "secondary-2 (bidir)",
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.5",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "example-4",
"description": "Example in slide 4",
"source": "192.0.2.1",
"destination": "192.0.2.5",
"bidirectional": false,
"primary-paths": {
"primary-path": [
{
"name": "primary-1 (fwd)",
"co-routed": [null],
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
},
"primary-reverse-path": {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 85]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"name": "primary-2 (rev)",
"candidate-secondary-reverse-paths": {
"candidate-secondary-reverse-path": [
"secondary-3 (rev)",
"secondary-4 (rev)"
]
}
},
"candidate-secondary-paths": {
"candidate-secondary-path": [
"secondary-1 (fwd)",
"secondary-2 (fwd)"
]
}
}
]
},
"secondary-paths": {
"secondary-path": [
{
"name": "secondary-1 (fwd)",
"co-routed": [null],
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.1"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.2",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "secondary-2 (fwd)",
"co-routed": [null],
"explicit-route-objects-always": {
"route-object-include-exclude": [
{
"index": 1,
"numbered-node-hop": {
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 86]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
"node-id": "192.0.2.2"
}
},
{
"index": 2,
"numbered-node-hop": {
"node-id": "192.0.2.5",
"hop-type": "loose"
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"secondary-reverse-paths": {
"secondary-reverse-path": [
{
"name": "secondary-3 (rev)"
},
{
"name": "secondary-4 (rev)"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
13. Appendix B: Full Model Tree Diagram
Figure 13 shows the full tree diagram of the TE YANG model defined in
module 'ietf-te.yang'.
module: ietf-te
+--rw te
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw globals
| +--rw named-admin-groups
| | +--rw named-admin-group* [name]
| | {te-types:extended-admin-groups,
| | te-types:named-extended-admin-groups}?
| | +--rw name string
| | +--rw bit-position? uint32
| +--rw named-srlgs
| | +--rw named-srlg* [name] {te-types:named-srlg-groups}?
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 87]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| | +--rw name string
| | +--rw value? te-types:srlg
| | +--rw cost? uint32
| +--rw named-path-constraints
| +--rw named-path-constraint* [name]
| {te-types:named-path-constraints}?
| +--rw name string
| +---u path-constraints-common
+--rw tunnels
| +--rw tunnel* [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw alias? string
| +--rw identifier? uint32
| +--rw color? uint32
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw admin-state? identityref
| +--ro operational-state? identityref
| +---u te-types:encoding-and-switching-type
| +---u tunnel-common-attributes
| +--rw controller
| | +--rw protocol-origin? identityref
| | +--rw controller-entity-id? string
| +--rw reoptimize-timer? uint16
| +---u tunnel-associations-properties
| +---u protection-restoration-properties
| +---u te-types:tunnel-constraints
| +---u tunnel-hierarchy-properties
| +--rw primary-paths
| | +--rw primary-path* [name]
| | +---u path-common-properties
| | +---u path-forward-properties
| | +---u k-requested-paths
| | +---u path-compute-info
| | +---u path-state
| | +--rw primary-reverse-path
| | | +---u path-common-properties
| | | +---u path-compute-info
| | | +---u path-state
| | | +--rw candidate-secondary-reverse-paths
| | | +--rw candidate-secondary-reverse-path*
| | | [secondary-path]
| | | +--rw secondary-path leafref
| | +--rw candidate-secondary-paths
| | +--rw candidate-secondary-path* [secondary-path]
| | +--rw secondary-path leafref
| | +--ro active? boolean
| +--rw secondary-paths
| | +--rw secondary-path* [name]
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 88]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| | +---u path-common-properties
| | +--rw preference? uint8
| | +---u path-compute-info
| | +---u protection-restoration-properties
| | +---u path-state
| +--rw secondary-reverse-paths
| | +--rw secondary-reverse-path* [name]
| | +---u path-common-properties
| | +--rw preference? uint8
| | +---u path-compute-info
| | +---u protection-restoration-properties
| | +---u path-state
| +---x tunnel-action
| | +---w input
| | | +---w action-type? identityref
| | +--ro output
| | +--ro action-result? identityref
| +---x protection-external-commands
| +---w input
| +---w protection-external-command? identityref
| +---w protection-group-ingress-node? boolean
| +---w protection-group-egress-node? boolean
| +---w path-name? string
| +---w path-type?
| | te-types:path-type
| +---w traffic-type? enumeration
| +---w extra-traffic-tunnel-ref? tunnel-ref
+--ro lsps
+--ro lsp* [tunnel-name lsp-id node]
+--ro tunnel-name string
+--ro lsp-id uint16
+--ro node
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro source?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro destination?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro tunnel-id? uint16
+--ro extended-tunnel-id? yang:dotted-quad
+--ro operational-state? identityref
+--ro signaling-type? identityref
+--ro origin-type? enumeration
+--ro lsp-resource-status? enumeration
+--ro lockout-of-normal? boolean
+--ro freeze? boolean
+--ro lsp-protection-role? enumeration
+--ro lsp-protection-state? identityref
+--ro protection-group-ingress-node-id?
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 89]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro protection-group-egress-node-id?
| te-types:te-node-id
+--ro lsp-actual-route-information
+--ro lsp-actual-route-information* [index]
+---u te-types:record-route-state
rpcs:
+---x tunnels-path-compute
| +---w input
| | +---w path-compute-info
| +--ro output
| +--ro path-compute-result
+---x tunnels-actions
+---w input
| +---w tunnel-info
| | +---w (filter-type)
| | +--:(all-tunnels)
| | | +---w all empty
| | +--:(one-tunnel)
| | +---w tunnel? tunnel-ref
| +---w action-info
| +---w action? identityref
| +---w disruptive? empty
+--ro output
+--ro action-result? identityref
grouping te-generic-node-id:
+-- id? te-gen-node-id
+-- type? enumeration
grouping path-common-properties:
+-- name? string
+-- path-computation-method? identityref
+-- path-computation-server
| +---u te-generic-node-id
+-- compute-only? empty
+-- use-path-computation? boolean
+-- lockdown? empty
+--ro path-scope? identityref
grouping path-compute-info:
+---u tunnel-associations-properties
+---u te-types:generic-path-optimization
+-- named-path-constraint? leafref
| {te-types:named-path-constraints}?
+---u path-constraints-common
grouping path-forward-properties:
+-- preference? uint8
+-- co-routed? boolean
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 90]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
grouping k-requested-paths:
+-- k-requested-paths? uint8
grouping path-state:
+---u path-computation-response
+--ro lsp-provisioning-error-infos
| +--ro lsp-provisioning-error-info* []
| +--ro error-reason? identityref
| +--ro error-description? string
| +--ro error-timestamp? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro error-node-id? te-types:te-node-id
| +--ro error-link-id? te-types:te-tp-id
| +--ro lsp-id? uint16
+--ro lsps
+--ro lsp* [node lsp-id]
+--ro tunnel-name? -> /te/lsps/lsp/tunnel-name
+--ro node? leafref
+--ro lsp-id? leafref
grouping path-computation-response:
+--ro computed-paths-properties
| +--ro computed-path-properties* [k-index]
| +--ro k-index? uint8
| +---u te-types:generic-path-properties
+--ro computed-path-error-infos
+--ro computed-path-error-info* []
+--ro error-description? string
+--ro error-timestamp? yang:date-and-time
+--ro error-reason? identityref
grouping protection-restoration-properties:
+-- protection
| +-- protection-type? identityref
| +-- protection-reversion-disable? boolean
| +-- hold-off-time? uint32
| +-- wait-to-revert? uint16
| +-- aps-signal-id? uint8
+-- restoration
+-- restoration-type? identityref
+-- restoration-scheme? identityref
+-- restoration-reversion-disable? boolean
+-- hold-off-time? uint32
+-- wait-to-restore? uint16
+-- wait-to-revert? uint16
grouping tunnel-associations-properties:
+-- association-objects
+-- association-object* [association-key]
| +-- association-key? string
| +-- type? identityref
| +-- id? uint16
| +-- source
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 91]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
| +---u te-generic-node-id
+-- association-object-extended* [association-key]
+-- association-key? string
+-- type? identityref
+-- id? uint16
+-- source
| +---u te-generic-node-id
+-- global-source? uint32
+-- extended-id? yang:hex-string
grouping tunnel-common-attributes:
+-- source? te-types:te-node-id
+-- destination? te-types:te-node-id
+-- src-tunnel-tp-id? binary
+-- dst-tunnel-tp-id? binary
+-- bidirectional? boolean
grouping tunnel-hierarchy-properties:
+-- hierarchy
+-- dependency-tunnels
| +-- dependency-tunnel* [name]
| +-- name?
| | -> /te/tunnels/tunnel/name
| +---u te-types:encoding-and-switching-type
+-- hierarchical-link
+-- enable? boolean
+-- local-te-node-id? te-types:te-node-id
+-- local-te-link-tp-id? te-types:te-tp-id
+-- remote-te-node-id? te-types:te-node-id
+---u te-types:te-topology-identifier
grouping path-constraints-common:
+---u te-types:common-path-constraints-attributes
+---u te-types:generic-path-disjointness
+---u te-types:path-constraints-route-objects
+-- path-in-segment!
| +---u te-types:label-set-info
+-- path-out-segment!
+---u te-types:label-set-info
Figure 13: Full tree diagram of TE Tunnel YANG data model
14. References
14.1. Normative References
[ITU_G.808.1]
ITU-T Recommendation G.808.1, "Generic protection
switching - Linear trail and subnetwork protection", ITU-T
G.808.1 , May 2014.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 92]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,
and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels", RFC 3209, DOI 10.17487/RFC3209, December 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209>.
[RFC3473] Berger, L., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-
Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3473, January 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3473>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4206] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Label Switched Paths (LSP)
Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)", RFC 4206,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4206, October 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4206>.
[RFC4427] Mannie, E., Ed. and D. Papadimitriou, Ed., "Recovery
(Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC 4427,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4427, March 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4427>.
[RFC4872] Lang, J.P., Ed., Rekhter, Y., Ed., and D. Papadimitriou,
Ed., "RSVP-TE Extensions in Support of End-to-End
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Recovery", RFC 4872, DOI 10.17487/RFC4872, May 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4872>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6107] Shiomoto, K., Ed. and A. Farrel, Ed., "Procedures for
Dynamically Signaled Hierarchical Label Switched Paths",
RFC 6107, DOI 10.17487/RFC6107, February 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6107>.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 93]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6780] Berger, L., Le Faucheur, F., and A. Narayanan, "RSVP
ASSOCIATION Object Extensions", RFC 6780,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6780, October 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6780>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7271] Ryoo, J., Ed., Gray, E., Ed., van Helvoort, H.,
D'Alessandro, A., Cheung, T., and E. Osborne, "MPLS
Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the
Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy,
Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network
Operators", RFC 7271, DOI 10.17487/RFC7271, June 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7271>.
[RFC7308] Osborne, E., "Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS
Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE)", RFC 7308,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7308, July 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7308>.
[RFC7471] Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., Atlas, A., and S.
Previdi, "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric
Extensions", RFC 7471, DOI 10.17487/RFC7471, March 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7471>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 94]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
[RFC8232] Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Medved, J., Varga, R., Zhang, X.,
and D. Dhody, "Optimizations of Label Switched Path State
Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE", RFC 8232,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8232, September 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8232>.
[RFC8234] Ryoo, J., Cheung, T., van Helvoort, H., Busi, I., and G.
Wen, "Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear
Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode",
RFC 8234, DOI 10.17487/RFC8234, August 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8234>.
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
"Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8570] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward,
D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE)
Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, March
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8570>.
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 95]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
[RFC8776] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and I. Bryskin,
"Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering",
RFC 8776, DOI 10.17487/RFC8776, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8776>.
[RFC8795] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and
O. Gonzalez de Dios, "YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering (TE) Topologies", RFC 8795,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8795, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8795>.
[RFC9012] Patel, K., Van de Velde, G., Sangli, S., and J. Scudder,
"The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute", RFC 9012,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9012, April 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9012>.
14.2. Informative References
[rfc3473] Berger, L., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-
Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3473, January 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3473>.
[RFC3945] Mannie, E., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3945, October 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3945>.
[RFC9256] Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Voyer, D., Bogdanov,
A., and P. Mattes, "Segment Routing Policy Architecture",
RFC 9256, DOI 10.17487/RFC9256, July 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9256>.
Authors' Addresses
Tarek Saad
Cisco Systems Inc
Email: tsaad.net@gmail.com
Rakesh Gandhi
Cisco Systems Inc
Email: rgandhi@cisco.com
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 96]
Internet-Draft TE YANG Data Model March 2023
Xufeng Liu
IBM Corporation
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Juniper Networks
Email: vbeeram@juniper.net
Igor Bryskin
Individual
Email: i_bryskin@yahoo.com
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Saad, et al. Expires 13 September 2023 [Page 97]