%% You should probably cite rfc9146 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-10, number = {draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-10}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id/10/}, author = {Eric Rescorla and Hannes Tschofenig and Thomas Fossati and Achim Kraus}, title = {{Connection Identifiers for DTLS 1.2}}, pagetotal = 17, year = 2021, month = mar, day = 7, abstract = {This document specifies the Connection ID (CID) construct for the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol version 1.2. A CID is an identifier carried in the record layer header that gives the recipient additional information for selecting the appropriate security association. In "classical" DTLS, selecting a security association of an incoming DTLS record is accomplished with the help of the 5-tuple. If the source IP address and/or source port changes during the lifetime of an ongoing DTLS session then the receiver will be unable to locate the correct security context.}, }