%% You should probably cite rfc6961 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension-01,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension/01/},
    author =    {Yngve Pettersen},
    title =     {{The TLS Multiple Certificate Status Request Extension}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2012,
    month =     jul,
    day =       8,
    abstract =  {This document defines the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Certificate Status Version 2 Extension to allow clients to specify and support multiple certificate status methods. Also defined is a new method that a server can use to provide status information (i.e., based on the Online Certificate Status Protocol and Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol) not just about the server's own certificate, but also the status of intermediate certificates in the chain.},
}