%% You should probably cite rfc6961 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension-02, number = {draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension/02/}, author = {Yngve Pettersen}, title = {{The TLS Multiple Certificate Status Request Extension}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2012, month = oct, day = 19, abstract = {This document defines the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Certificate Status Version 2 Extension to allow clients to specify and support multiple certificate status methods. Also defined is a new method based on the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) that servers can use to provide status information not just about the server's own certificate, but also the status of intermediate certificates in the chain.}, }