Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-12
Yes
(Pasi Eronen)
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Lars Eggert)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2010-08-11)
Unknown
I am agreeing with Peter's DISCUSS.
Additionally, I have the following comments:
10.1 pkipath MIME Type Registration
The "Encoding Considerations" section should say that the data is binary.
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Magnus Nystrom <magnus@rsasecurity.com>
I vaguely remember that Magnus has changed jobs since, so this email address is no longer valid.
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-09-20)
Unknown
Thanks for addressng my Discuss and Comment. I have Cleared.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-08-09)
Unknown
== Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 1027, but no explicit reference was found in the text -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2246 (Obsoleted by RFC 4346) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4346 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4366 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown