IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS
draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-08
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (tls WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph A. Salowey , Sean Turner | ||
| Last updated | 2024-01-25 (Latest revision 2024-01-23) | ||
| Replaces | draft-salowey-tls-rfc8447bis | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-08
Transport Layer Security J. Salowey
Internet-Draft Venafi
Updates: 3749, 5077, 4680, 5246, 5705, 5878, S. Turner
6520, 7301, 8447 (if approved) sn3rd
Intended status: Standards Track 23 January 2024
Expires: 26 July 2024
IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS
draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-08
Abstract
This document updates the changes to TLS and DTLS IANA registries
made in RFC 8447. It adds a new value "D" for discouraged to the
recommended column of the selected TLS registries.
This document updates the following RFCs: 3749, 5077, 4680, 5246,
5705, 5878, 6520, 7301, and 8447.
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Status information for this document may be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis/.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Transport Layer
Security Working Group mailing list (mailto:tls@ietf.org), which is
archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/. Subscribe
at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 26 July 2024.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Adding "Recommended" Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Recommended Note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. TLS ExtensionType Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. TLS Cipher Suites Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. TLS Supported Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. TLS Exporter Labels Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. TLS Certificate Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9. TLS HashAlgorithm Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
10. TLS SignatureAlgorithm registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
11. TLS ClientCertificateTypes registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
12. TLS PskKeyExchangeMode registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
13. TLS SignatureScheme registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
14. Adding "Comment" Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
15. Expert Review of Current and Potential IETF and IRTF
Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
16. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
17. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
18. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
1. Introduction
This document instructs IANA to make changes to a number of the IANA
registries related to Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram
Transport Layer Security (DTLS). These changes update the changes
made in [RFC8447].
| NOTE for IANA: This document specifies changes to the registry
| to update the changes made in [RFC8447].
This specification updates the "Recommended" column in TLS registries
to define a third value "D" for items that are discouraged.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
3. Adding "Recommended" Column
The instructions in this document update the Recommended column,
originally added in [RFC8447] to add a third value, "D", indicating
that a value is "Discouraged". The permitted values are:
Y: Indicates that the IETF has consensus that the item is
RECOMMENDED. This only means that the associated mechanism is fit
for the purpose for which it was defined. Careful reading of the
documentation for the mechanism is necessary to understand the
applicability of that mechanism. The IETF could recommend
mechanisms that have limited applicability, but will provide
applicability statements that describe any limitations of the
mechanism or necessary constraints on its use.
N: Indicates that the item has not been evaluated by the IETF and
that the IETF has made no statement about the suitability of the
associated mechanism. This does not necessarily mean that the
mechanism is flawed, only that no consensus exists. The IETF
might have consensus to leave an items marked as "N" on the basis
of it having limited applicability or usage constraints.
D: Indicates that the item is discouraged. This marking could be
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
used to identify mechanisms that might result in problems if they
are used, such as a weak cryptographic algorithm or a mechanism
that might cause interoperability problems in deployment.
Implementers SHOULD consult the linked references associated with
the item to determine the conditions under which it SHOULD NOT or
MUST NOT be used.
Setting a value to "Y" or "D" in the "Recommended" column requires
IETF Standards Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a
"Y" or "D" value requires IESG Approval. Not all items defined in
Standards Track RFCs need to be set to "Y" or "D". Any item not
otherwise specified is set to "N". The column is blank for values
that are unassigned or reserved unless specifically set.
3.1. Recommended Note
Existing registries have a note on the meaning of the recommended
column. For the registries discussed in the subsequent sections this
note is updated with a sentence describing the "D" vaue as follows:
Note: If "Recommended" column is set to "N", it does not necessarily
mean that it is flawed; rather, it indicates that the item either
has not been through the IETF consensus process, has limited
applicability, or is intended only for specific use cases. If the
"Recommended" column is set to "D" the item is discouraged and
SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT be used.
4. TLS ExtensionType Values
In order to refect the changes in the Recommended column allocation,
IANA SHALL update the TLS ExtensionType Values registry as follows:
* Change the registration procedure to:
Values with the first byte in the range 0-254 (decimal) are assigned
via Specification Required [RFC8126]. Values with the first byte
255 (decimal) are reserved for Private Use [RFC8126]. Setting a
"Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards Action [RFC8126].
Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D" value requires
IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the "Recommended" column with the changes as listed below.
Entries keep their existing "Y" and "N" entries except for the
entries in following table. A reference to this document SHALL be
added to these entries.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
+=======+============================+=============+
| Value | Extension | Recommended |
+=======+============================+=============+
| 4 | truncated_hmac | D |
+-------+----------------------------+-------------+
| 53 | connection_id (deprecated) | D |
+-------+----------------------------+-------------+
| 40 | Reserved | D |
+-------+----------------------------+-------------+
| 46 | Reserved | D |
+-------+----------------------------+-------------+
Table 1
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
5. TLS Cipher Suites Registry
Several categories of ciphersuites are discouraged for general use
and are maked as "D".
Ciphersuites that use NULL encryption do not provide the
confidentiality normally expected of TLS. Protocols and applications
are often designed to require confidentialy as a security property.
These ciphersuites MUST NOT be used in those cases.
Ciphersuites marked as EXPORT use weak ciphers and were deprecated in
TLS 1.1 [RFC4346].
Cipher suites maked as anon do not provide any authentication and are
vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks and are deprecated in TLS 1.1
[RFC4346].
RC4 is a weak cipher and is deprecated in [RFC7465].
DES and IDEA are not considered secure for general use and are
deprecated in [RFC5469].
In order to refect the changes in the Recommended column allocation,
IANA SHALL update the TLS ExtensionType Values registry as follows:
* Change the registration procedure to:
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
Values with the first byte in the range 0-254 (decimal) are
assigned via Specification Required [RFC8126]. Values with the
first byte 255 (decimal) are reserved for Private Use [RFC8126].
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the "Recommended" column with the changes as listed below.
Entries keep their existing "Y" and "N" entries except for the
entries in following table. A reference to this document SHALL be
added to these entries. This document does not make any changes
to the DTLS-OK column.
+=========+==========================================+============+
|Value | Cipher Suite Name | Recommeded |
+=========+==========================================+============+
|0x00,0x01| TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x02| TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x03| TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x04| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x05| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x06| TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x07| TLS_RSA_WITH_IDEA_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x08| TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x09| TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x0B| TLS_DH_DSS_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x0C| TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x0E| TLS_DH_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x0F| TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x11| TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x12| TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
|0x00,0x14| TLS_DHE_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x15| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x17| TLS_DH_anon_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x18| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x19| TLS_DH_anon_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x1A| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x1B| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x1E| TLS_KRB5_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x20| TLS_KRB5_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x21| TLS_KRB5_WITH_IDEA_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x22| TLS_KRB5_WITH_DES_CBC_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x24| TLS_KRB5_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x25| TLS_KRB5_WITH_IDEA_CBC_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x26| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_DES_CBC_40_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x27| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x28| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x29| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_DES_CBC_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x2A| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x2B| TLS_KRB5_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x2C| TLS_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x2D| TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x2E| TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x34| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x3A| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
|0x00,0x3B| TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x46| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x6C| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x6D| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x89| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x8A| TLS_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x8E| TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x92| TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0x9B| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xA6| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xA7| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB0| TLS_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB1| TLS_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB4| TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB5| TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB8| TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xB9| TLS_RSA_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xBF| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0x00,0xC5| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x01| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x02| TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x06| TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x07| TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x0B| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
|0xC0,0x0C| TLS_ECDH_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x10| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x11| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x15| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x16| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x17| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x18| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x19| TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x33| TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_RC4_128_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x39| TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x3A| TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x3B| TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x46| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_128_CBC_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x47| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_256_CBC_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x5A| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x5B| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_ARIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x84| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0x85| TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0xB4| TLS_SHA256_SHA256 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
|0xC0,0xB5| TLS_SHA384_SHA384 | D |
+---------+------------------------------------------+------------+
Table 2
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
6. TLS Supported Groups
In order to refect the changes in the Recommended column allocation,
IANA SHALL update the TLS Supported Groups registry as follows:
* Update the registration policy to include:
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the "Recommended" column with the changes as listed below.
Entries keep their existing "Y" and "N" entries except for the
entries in following table. A reference to this document SHALL be
added to these entries.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
+=======+===========+=============+
| Value | Curve | Recommended |
+=======+===========+=============+
| 1 | sect163k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 2 | sect163r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 3 | sect163r2 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 4 | sect193r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 5 | sect193r2 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 6 | sect233k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 7 | sect233r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 8 | sect239k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 15 | secp160k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 16 | secp160r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 17 | secp160r2 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 18 | secp192k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 19 | secp192r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 20 | secp224k1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
| 21 | secp224r1 | D |
+-------+-----------+-------------+
Table 3
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
7. TLS Exporter Labels Registry
This document updates the registration procedure for the TLS Exporter
registry and updates the Recommended column allocation. IANA SHALL
update the TLS Exporter Labels Registry as follows:
* Change the registration procedure from Specification Required to
Expert Review and update it to include:
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Entries keep their existing Recommended column "Y" and "N" entries
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
* update the note on the role of the expert reviewer as follows.
Note: The role of the designated expert is described in [RFC8447].
Even though this registry does not require a specification, the
designated expert [RFC8126] will strongly encourage registrants to
provide a link to a publicly available specification. An
Internet-Draft (that is posted and never published as an RFC) or a
document from another standards body, industry consortium,
university site, etc. are suitable for these purposes. The expert
may provide more in-depth reviews, but their approval should not
be taken as an endorsement of the exporter label. The expert also
verifies that the label is a string consisting of printable ASCII
characters beginning with "EXPORTER". IANA MUST also verify that
one label is not a prefix of any other label. For example, labels
"key" or "master secretary" are forbidden.
8. TLS Certificate Types
In order to refect the changes in the Recommended column allocation,
IANA SHALL update the the TLS Certificate Types registry as follows:
* Change the registration procedure to:
Values in the range 0-223 (decimal) are assigned via Specification
Required [RFC8126]. Values in the range 224-255 (decimal) are
reserved for Private Use [RFC8126]. Setting a "Recommended" column
value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Entries keep their existing Recommended column "Y" and "N"
entries.
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
9. TLS HashAlgorithm Registry
Though TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 were deprecated [RFC8996], TLS 1.2 will be
in use for some time. In order to refect the changes in the
Recommended column allocation, IANA SHALL update the TLS
HashAlgorithm Registry registry as follows:
* Update the registration procedure to include:
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the TLS HashAlgorithm registry to add a "Recommended"
column as follows:
+=======+==============+=============+
| Value | Descsription | Recommended |
+=======+==============+=============+
| 0 | none | Y |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 1 | md5 | D |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 2 | sha1 | D |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 3 | sha224 | D |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 4 | sha256 | Y |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 5 | sha384 | Y |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 6 | sha512 | Y |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
| 8 | Intrinsic | Y |
+-------+--------------+-------------+
Table 4
* Add note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
10. TLS SignatureAlgorithm registry
Though TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 were deprecated [RFC8996], TLS 1.2 will be
in use for some time. In order to refect the changes in the
Recommended column allocation, IANA SHALL update the TLS
SignatureAlgorithm registry registry as follows:
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
* Update the registration procedure to include:
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the TLS SignatureAlgorithm registry to add a "Recommended"
column as follows:
+=======+===================+=============+
| Value | Descsription | Recommended |
+=======+===================+=============+
| 0 | anonymous | N |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 1 | rsa | Y |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 2 | dsa | N |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 3 | ecdsa | Y |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 7 | ed25519 | Y |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 8 | ed448 | Y |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 64 | gostr34102012_256 | N |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
| 65 | gostr34102012_512 | N |
+-------+-------------------+-------------+
Table 5
* Add note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
11. TLS ClientCertificateTypes registry
Though TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 were deprecated [RFC8996], TLS 1.2 will be
in use for some time. In order to refect the changes in the
Recommended column allocation, IANA SHALL update the TLS
ClientCertificateTypes registry as follows:
* Update the registration procedure to include:
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Update the TLS ClientCertificateTypes registry to add a
"Recommended" column as follows:
+=======+===========================+=============+
| Value | Descsription | Recommended |
+=======+===========================+=============+
| 1 | rsa_sign | Y |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 2 | dss_sign | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 3 | rsa_fixed_dh | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 4 | dss_fixed_dh | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 5 | rsa_ephemeral_dh_RESERVED | D |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 6 | dss_ephemeral_dh_RESERVED | D |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 20 | fortezza_dms_RESERVED | D |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 64 | ecdsa_sign | Y |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 65 | rsa_fixed_ecdh | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 66 | ecdsa_fixed_ecdh | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 67 | gost_sign256 | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
| 68 | gost_sign512 | N |
+-------+---------------------------+-------------+
Table 6
* Add note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
12. TLS PskKeyExchangeMode registry
In order to refect the changes in the Recommended column allocation,
IANA SHALL update the TLS PskKeyExchangeMode registry as follows:
* Update the registration procedure to include:
Setting a "Recommended" column value to "Y" or "D" requires Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Any state transition to or from a "Y" or "D"
value requires IESG Approval.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
* Add a reference to this document under the reference heading.
* Entries keep their existing recommended column "Y" and "N"
entries.
* Update note on the recommended column with text in Section 3.1.
13. TLS SignatureScheme registry
IANA is requested to add a reference to this document under the
reference heading.
14. Adding "Comment" Column
IANA is requested to add a "Comment" column to the following
registries:
* TLS ExtensionType Values
* TLS Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs
* TLS CachedInformationType Values
* TLS Certificate Compression Algorithm IDs
* TLS Cipher Suites
* TLS ContentType
* TLS EC Point Formats
* TLS EC Curve Types
* TLS Supplemental Data Formats (SupplementalDataType)
* TLS UserMappingType Values
* TLS Authorization Data Formats
* TLS Heartbeat Message Types
* TLS Heartbeat Modes
* TLS SignatureScheme
* TLS PskKeyExchangeMode
* TLS KDF Identifiers
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
This list of registries is all registries that do not already have a
"Comment" or "Notes" column or that were not orphaned by TLS 1.3.
15. Expert Review of Current and Potential IETF and IRTF Documents
The intent of the Specification Required standard for TLS code points
is to allow for easy registration for code points associated with
protocols and algorithms that are not being actively developed inside
IETF or IRTF. When TLS-based technologies are being developed inside
the IRTF/IETF they should be done in coordination with the TLS WG in
order to provide appropriate review. For this reason, designated
experts should decline code point registrations for documents which
have already been adopted or are being proposed for adoption by IETF
working groups or IRTF research groups.
16. Security Considerations
The change to Specification Required from IETF Review lowers the
amount of review provided by the WG for cipher suites and supported
groups. This change reflects reality in that the WG essentially
provided no cryptographic review of the cipher suites or supported
groups. This was especially true of national cipher suites.
Recommended algorithms are regarded as secure for general use at the
time of registration; however, cryptographic algorithms and
parameters will be broken or weakened over time. It is possible that
the "Recommended" status in the registry lags behind the most recent
advances in cryptanalysis. Implementers and users need to check that
the cryptographic algorithms listed continue to provide the expected
level of security.
Designated experts ensure the specification is publicly available.
They may provide more in-depth reviews. Their review should not be
taken as an endorsement of the cipher suite, extension, supported
group, etc.
17. IANA Considerations
This document is entirely about changes to TLS-related IANA
registries.
18. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft (D)TLS IANA Registry Updates January 2024
[RFC4346] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4346, April 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4346>.
[RFC5469] Eronen, P., Ed., "DES and IDEA Cipher Suites for Transport
Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 5469, DOI 10.17487/RFC5469,
February 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5469>.
[RFC7465] Popov, A., "Prohibiting RC4 Cipher Suites", RFC 7465,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7465, February 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7465>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8447] Salowey, J. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS
and DTLS", RFC 8447, DOI 10.17487/RFC8447, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8447>.
[RFC8996] Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS
1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8996>.
Authors' Addresses
Joe Salowey
Venafi
Email: joe@salowey.net
Sean Turner
sn3rd
Email: sean@sn3rd.com
Salowey & Turner Expires 26 July 2024 [Page 18]