Gossiping in CT
draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (trans WG)
Last updated 2020-02-25 (latest revision 2018-01-14)
Replaces draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Experimental
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Melinda Shore
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2017-03-16)
IESG IESG state Expired (IESG: Dead)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD Roman Danyliw
Send notices to "Melinda Shore" <melinda.shore@gmail.com>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05.txt

Abstract

The logs in Certificate Transparency are untrusted in the sense that the users of the system don't have to trust that they behave correctly since the behavior of a log can be verified to be correct. This document tries to solve the problem with logs presenting a "split view" of their operations or failing to incorporate a submission within MMD. It describes three gossiping mechanisms for Certificate Transparency: SCT Feedback, STH Pollination and Trusted Auditor Relationship.

Authors

Linus Nordberg (linus@nordu.net)
Daniel Gillmor (dkg@fifthhorseman.net)
Tom Ritter (tom@ritter.vg)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)