%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05 instead of this revision. @techreport{ietf-trans-gossip-01, number = {draft-ietf-trans-gossip-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-gossip/01/}, author = {Linus Nordberg and Daniel Kahn Gillmor and Tom Ritter}, title = {{Gossiping in CT}}, pagetotal = 26, year = 2015, month = oct, day = 19, abstract = {The logs in Certificate Transparency are untrusted in the sense that the users of the system don't have to trust that they behave correctly since the behaviour of a log can be verified to be correct. This document tries to solve the problem with logs presenting a "split view" of their operations. It describes three gossiping mechanisms for Certificate Transparency: SCT Feedback, STH Pollination and Trusted Auditor Relationship.}, }