Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Multi-Topology
draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-06
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-31
|
06 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2018-04-20
|
06 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from EDIT |
2018-03-14
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2018-03-14
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2018-03-13
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2018-03-13
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2018-03-12
|
06 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2018-03-12
|
06 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2018-03-12
|
06 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2018-03-12
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2018-03-12
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2018-03-12
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2018-03-12
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2018-03-09
|
06 | Alia Atlas | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2018-03-09
|
06 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2018-03-09
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-06.txt |
2018-03-09
|
06 | (System) | Secretariat manually posting. Approvals already received |
2018-03-09
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | Uploaded new revision |
2018-03-08
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2018-03-08
|
05 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Magnus Nystrom. |
2018-03-08
|
05 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot comment] Review in context: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3642 A diagram in the introduction would have helped me. Grained Label [RFC7172 … [Ballot comment] Review in context: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3642 A diagram in the introduction would have helped me. Grained Label [RFC7172]. By implication, an "FGL TRILL switch" does not support MT. You are using MT before expansion here. But I actually don't understand why it does not. Can you explain? implication, a "VL RBridge" or "VL TRILL switch" does not support FGL or MT. My same question here as above. Why can't a VL TRILL switch support MT? (1) all TRILL switch ports on the link advertise topology T support in their Hellos and (2) if any TRILL switch port on the link requires explicit TRILL Data Probably stupid question but how do you know that there aren't TRILL switches that you haven't heard from yet that don't support T? V - The version number of the MT label. This document specifies version zero. What do I do if I receive an unknown version? + There may be non-zero topologies with no multi-destination traffic or, as descried in [RFC5120], even topologies with no traffic at all. For example, if only known destination Nit: described topology, there would be no need for a distribution tree for topology T. For this reasons, a Number of Trees to Compute of zero in the Trees sub-TLV for the TRILL switch holding Nit: "reason" |
2018-03-08
|
05 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla |
2018-03-08
|
05 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-03-07
|
05 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] Apologies, I ran out of time for this one. |
2018-03-07
|
05 | Ben Campbell | Ballot comment text updated for Ben Campbell |
2018-03-07
|
05 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2018-03-07
|
05 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-03-07
|
05 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2018-03-06
|
05 | Tim Chown | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Tim Chown. Sent review to list. |
2018-03-06
|
05 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-03-06
|
05 | Alia Atlas | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2018-03-06
|
05 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2018-03-06
|
05 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2018-03-06
|
05 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2018-03-05
|
05 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot comment] The extensions defined in this document are "an optional TRILL switch capability". To me, that indicates that the base TRILL specifications rfc6325 and … [Ballot comment] The extensions defined in this document are "an optional TRILL switch capability". To me, that indicates that the base TRILL specifications rfc6325 and rfc7177 (in this case) are not affected: an RBridge is TRILL-compliant as long as it implements what rfc6325 specifies (without these optional extensions). I would then like to see the formal "Updates" tags removed. [The publication of this document is not the place to argue about the meaning of "Updates", so I'll defer to what the Responsible AD decides.] |
2018-03-05
|
05 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-03-05
|
05 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2018-03-02
|
05 | Brian Carpenter | Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Brian Carpenter. Sent review to list. |
2018-03-02
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Ballot has been issued |
2018-03-02
|
05 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2018-03-02
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Created "Approve" ballot |
2018-03-02
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Ballot writeup was changed |
2018-03-01
|
05 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2018-03-01
|
05 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-05. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let … (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-05. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. The IANA Services Operator understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which we must complete. In the PORT-TRILL-VER Sub-TLV Capability Flags regsitry on the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Parameters registry page located at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/trill-parameters/ a single registration consisting of two adjacent bits will be made as follows: Bit: [ TBD-at-Registration ] and [ TBD-at-Registration ] Description: Topology labeling support Reference: [ RFC-to-be ] We understand that these two bits are to be adjacent and from the bits available between 14 and 31. IANA also notes that the authors suggest bits 14 and 15 for this assignment. The IANA Services Operator understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is meant only to confirm the list of actions that will be performed. Please note that specific values cannot be reserved. However, early allocation is available for some types of registrations. For more information, please see RFC 7120. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal Senior IANA Services Specialist |
2018-02-26
|
05 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter |
2018-02-26
|
05 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Brian Carpenter |
2018-02-23
|
05 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tim Chown |
2018-02-23
|
05 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tim Chown |
2018-02-20
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2018-02-20
|
05 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2018-03-06): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: trill-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, akatlas@gmail.com … The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2018-03-06): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: trill-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, akatlas@gmail.com Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (TRILL: Multi-Topology) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links WG (trill) to consider the following document: - 'TRILL: Multi-Topology' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-03-06. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies extensions to the IETF TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) protocol to support multi-topology routing of unicast and multi-destination traffic based on IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) multi-topology specified in RFC 5120. This document updates RFC 6325 and RFC 7177. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2018-02-20
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2018-02-20
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Last call announcement was changed |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Last call was requested |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Last call announcement was generated |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Ballot approval text was generated |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Ballot writeup was generated |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Alia Atlas | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Susan Hares | template date: 24 February 2012. (1)RFC: Proposed Standard (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. … template date: 24 February 2012. (1)RFC: Proposed Standard (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary Abstract This document specifies extensions to the IETF TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) protocol to support multi-topology routing of unicast and multi-destination traffic based on IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) multi-topology specified in RFC 5120. This document updates RFC 6325 and RFC 7177. Working Group Summary Strong Consensus as part of the solution for WG milestones on multiple topology. TRILL works differently than other WGs. It has brought up lots of drafts, and had deep engineering discussions at IETF. The engineers go off and debate the topics one-on-one or individually. The depth of the engineering clue is high (e.g. Radia Perlman, Donald Eastlake, Jon Hudson, Mingui Zhang, Ayan Banerjee, and others. The WG simply does not waste time on fights or much email. So.. IESG, if you are looking for the email trail. It just is not going to be there - as you expect. If you look for engineering quality in this draft, you will find it. Document Quality Engineering on Technology good. Document has been through strong editing by main author to remove "engineering-english". Donald Eastlake has been an editor for IEEE documents, you will find this influnces his style. IESG - Please consider your review whether you are complaining about style or substance. Personnel Shepherd: Susan Hares AD: Alia Atlas RTG-DIR early reviewer: Martin Vigoureux (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready for publication, please explain why the document is being forwarded to the IESG. a) Nits b) Review RTG-DIR reviewer only substantive concern was one definition: MT TRILL Switch\ c) Review of final document. (4) Does the document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No. (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. No. (6) Describe any specific concerns or issues that the Document Shepherd has with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? None. (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why. Donald Eastlake: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/WZvpHzLEQWg-nvA14GeNOJRUEz8 Mingui Zhang https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/QWOKhk7AjrRLACcvH1bd6EjUzEg Ayan Banerjee https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/0dqF2A4S87gvx3E6yNlDsSXpp-s (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document? If so, summarize any WG discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR disclosures. No IPR disclosures (9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? Solid. Again, the IESG will have trouble with the lack of substantive debate during the last year. The TRILL WG took on several key pieces of work (directory services, multi-topology enhancements, group key security). This working group has a solid engineering approach were we went off did a bunch of drafts, discussed at IETF meetings the options and went back and refined the documents. The issues in the multiple topologies are complex, but well know to the authors who come from two vendors that deployed early TRILL work. Again, the solution was debated and the draft approach set-up. Then, individuals took on writing the drafts and getting feedback. The result is a solid document - but little email. Just warning you, it is not there. TRILL has solid engineering by quiet individuals goes against the list debate style. (10) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is publicly available.) Nope - see comments in #9. (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this document. (See https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Again. Two things are nitted - the fact the authors had this ready for the shepherd and it has sat behind other drafts. (mia culpa) [IS-IS] - ISO/IEC 10589:2002 - is correctly stated, but the NITS wonders. (sigh.. ) (12) Describe how the document meets any required formal review criteria, such as the MIB Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews. None. Security considerations are brief, but RFC6325 is there. If group keys are part of concern, see the protocol independent solution. draft-ietf-trill-group-keying-01 We suggest that the Security Dispatch group take it over, and the routing can provide a provide (draft-ietf-trill-link-gk-profiles-00) to the rtgwg. TRILL has engineered a solution, but we will need to have security area review. (13) Have all references within this document been identified as either normative or informative? Yes - Please note that ISIS (ISO10589) sometimes gives the NITS program fits. It is correct, but NITS complains. (sigh) (14) Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the plan for their completion? no (15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure. no. (16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? Updates: RFC6325, RFC 7177 RFCs in header, abstract, and introduction. (17) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the IANA considerations section, especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document. IANA section requests: 1) the IEEE Registration Authority will be requested to allocate a new Ethertype for the MT label 2) assign two adjacent bits (TBD) from bits 14 through 31 of the Capabilities bits of the Port TRILL Version Sub-TLV for the Explicit Topology capability field and update the "PORT-TRILL-VER Capability Bits" registry as follows (18) List any new IANA registries that require Expert Review for future allocations. Provide any public guidance that the IESG would find useful in selecting the IANA Experts for these new registries. None. (19) Describe reviews and automated checks performed by the Document Shepherd to validate sections of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc. none |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Susan Hares | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Susan Hares | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Susan Hares | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2018-02-19
|
05 | Susan Hares | Changed document writeup |
2018-02-16
|
05 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Magnus Nystrom |
2018-02-16
|
05 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Magnus Nystrom |
2018-02-15
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Shepherding AD changed to Alia Atlas |
2018-02-15
|
05 | Éric Vyncke | Assignment of request for Telechat review by OPSDIR to Éric Vyncke was rejected |
2018-02-15
|
05 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Éric Vyncke |
2018-02-15
|
05 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Éric Vyncke |
2018-02-15
|
05 | Alia Atlas | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2018-03-08 |
2018-01-22
|
05 | Susan Hares | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2017-11-12
|
05 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-05.txt |
2017-11-12
|
05 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-11-12
|
05 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ayan Banerjee , Donald Eastlake , Mingui Zhang |
2017-11-12
|
05 | Donald Eastlake | Uploaded new revision |
2017-10-01
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | See https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07910.html |
2017-10-01
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2017-10-01
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2017-10-01
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2017-05-22
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-04.txt |
2017-05-22
|
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-05-22
|
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Ayan Banerjee , Donald Eastlake , Mingui Zhang |
2017-05-22
|
04 | Donald Eastlake | Uploaded new revision |
2016-11-28
|
03 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-03.txt |
2016-11-28
|
03 | (System) | New version approved |
2016-11-28
|
03 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Donald Eastlake" , "Mingui Zhang" , "Ayan Banerjee" |
2016-11-28
|
03 | Donald Eastlake | Uploaded new revision |
2016-06-06
|
02 | Jonathan Hardwick | Request for Early review by RTGDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Martin Vigoureux. |
2016-06-04
|
02 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-02.txt |
2016-05-05
|
01 | Jonathan Hardwick | Request for Early review by RTGDIR is assigned to Martin Vigoureux |
2016-05-05
|
01 | Jonathan Hardwick | Request for Early review by RTGDIR is assigned to Martin Vigoureux |
2016-02-28
|
01 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-01.txt |
2015-10-14
|
00 | (System) | Notify list changed from "Susan Hares" to (None) |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Donald Eastlake | Notification list changed to "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Donald Eastlake | Document shepherd changed to Susan Hares |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Donald Eastlake | This document now replaces draft-eastlake-trill-multi-topology instead of None |
2015-09-01
|
00 | Donald Eastlake | New version available: draft-ietf-trill-multi-topology-00.txt |