%% You should probably cite rfc7780 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-trill-rfc7180bis-03, number = {draft-ietf-trill-rfc7180bis-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rfc7180bis/03/}, author = {Donald E. Eastlake 3rd and Mingui Zhang and Radia Perlman and Ayan Banerjee and Anoop Ghanwani and Sujay Gupta}, title = {{TRILL: Clarifications, Corrections, and Updates}}, pagetotal = 59, year = 2015, month = mar, day = 9, abstract = {Since publication of the TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) base protocol in 2011, active development and deployment of TRILL has revealed errata in RFC 6325 and areas that could use clarifications or updates. RFCs 7177, 7357, and draft-eastlake-trill- rfc6439bis provide clarifications and updates with respect to Adjacency, the TRILL ESADI (End Station Address Distribution Information) protocol, and Appointed Forwarders respectively. This document provides other known clarifications, corrections, and updates. It obsoletes RFC 7180 (the previous TRILL clarifications, corrections, and updates RFC), updates RFC 7177, updates RFC 7179, and updates RFC 6325.}, }