Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Clarifications, Corrections, and Updates
draft-ietf-trill-rfc7180bis-07
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
No Objection
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -06)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-19 for -06)
Unknown
Based on a scan of the changes compared to the obsoleted and updated RFCs in appendix C, I don't see any changes that would impact OPS.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-22 for -06)
Unknown
I would like to thank Meral for the extensive and detailed Gen-ART review.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-10-21 for -06)
Unknown
The security considerations text left me wondering what "some" of the changes were as there is only one consideration listed. Are there considerations for this change: Appendix C.2 3. Change for the requirement to use the RPF check in [RFC6325] for multi-destination TRILL Data packets by providing an alternative stronger RPF check. Or for any other changes? Thanks.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -06)
Unknown