Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Clarifications, Corrections, and Updates
draft-ietf-trill-rfc7180bis-07

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-22 for -06)
No email
send info
I would like to thank Meral for the extensive and detailed Gen-ART review.

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-19 for -06)
No email
send info
Based on a scan of the changes compared to the obsoleted and updated RFCs in appendix C, I don't see any changes that would impact OPS.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-21 for -06)
No email
send info
The security considerations text left me wondering what "some" of the changes were as there is only one consideration listed.
Are there considerations for this change:

Appendix C.2
 3. Change for the requirement to use the RPF check in [RFC6325] for
      multi-destination TRILL Data packets by providing an alternative
      stronger RPF check.

Or for any other changes?

Thanks.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection