Skip to main content

Updates to Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements
draft-ietf-tsvwg-behave-requirements-update-08

Yes

(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -07) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-03-01 for -07) Unknown
Some very minor comments:

- I echo Stephen's thanks to the shepherd for the details on the handling of the IPR disclosure.

- 14, third paragraph:
Please consider changing the "MUST...only" construction to either "MAY...only" or "MUST NOT...unless". I personally prefer the latter.  (OTOH, isn't this already covered normatively in section 3? Perhaps it could be descriptive here.)

-- Third paragraph from end:
s/"Hosts which require..."/"Hosts that require..."
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-03-01 for -07) Unknown
- Thanks for the info about the IPR declaration in the write
up. It's useful to know that. 

- intro: Phrases like "greatly advanced" always make me think
I'm getting sales talk and make me wonder why. (In this case,
there was no other sales talk though, and thanks for that:-)
I think s/greatly advanced/documented/ would have been fine.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -07) Unknown