%% You should probably cite rfc9599 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-22, number = {draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-22}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/22/}, author = {Bob Briscoe and John Kaippallimalil}, title = {{Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP}}, pagetotal = 35, year = 2023, month = dec, day = 5, abstract = {The purpose of this document is to guide the design of congestion notification in any lower layer or tunnelling protocol that encapsulates IP. The aim is for explicit congestion signals to propagate consistently from lower layer protocols into IP. Then the IP internetwork layer can act as a portability layer to carry congestion notification from non-IP-aware congested nodes up to the transport layer (L4). Following these guidelines should assure interworking among IP layer and lower layer congestion notification mechanisms, whether specified by the IETF or other standards bodies. This document is included in BCP 89 and updates the single paragraph of advice to subnetwork designers about ECN in Section 13 of RFC 3819, by replacing it with a reference to the whole of this document.}, }