%% You should probably cite rfc5129 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02, number = {draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls/02/}, author = {Bob Briscoe and Dr. Bruce S. Davie and June Tay}, title = {{Explicit Congestion Marking in MPLS}}, pagetotal = 21, year = 2007, month = oct, day = 4, abstract = {RFC 3270 defines how to support the Diffserv architecture in MPLS networks, including how to encode Diffserv Code Points (DSCPs) in an MPLS header. DSCPs may be encoded in the EXP field, while other uses of that field are not precluded. RFC 3270 makes no statement about how Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) marking might be encoded in the MPLS header. This document defines how an operator might define some of the EXP codepoints for explicit congestion notification, without precluding other uses. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }