%% You should probably cite rfc4495 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction/02/},
    author =    {Subha Dhesikan and James Polk},
    title =     {{A Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Extension for the Reduction of Bandwidth of a Reservation Flow}},
    pagetotal = 21,
    year =      2006,
    month =     jan,
    day =       25,
    abstract =  {This document proposes an extension to the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVPv1) to reduce the guaranteed bandwidth allocated to an existing reservation. This mechanism can be used to affect individual reservations, aggregate reservations, or other forms of RSVP tunnels. This specification is an extension of RFC 2205. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}