%% You should probably cite rfc7829 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-11,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-11},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover/11/},
    author =    {Yoshifumi Nishida and Preethi Natarajan and Armando L. Caro and Paul D. Amer and karen Nielsen},
    title =     {{SCTP-PF: Quick Failover Algorithm in SCTP}},
    pagetotal = 21,
    year =      2015,
    month =     jul,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {SCTP supports multi-homing. However, when the failover operation specified in RFC4960 is followed, there can be significant delay and performance degradation in the data transfer path failover. To overcome this problem this document specifies a quick failover algorithm (SCTP-PF) based on the introduction of a Potentially Failed (PF) state in SCTP Path Management. The document also specifies a dormant state operation of SCTP. This dormant state operation is required to be followed by an SCTP-PF implementation, but it may equally well be applied by a standard RFC4960 SCTP implementation. Additionally, the document introduces an alternative switchback mode called Permanent Failover that will be beneficial in some situations. This mode of operation applies to both a standard RFC4960 SCTP implementation as well as to a SCTP-PF implementation. The procedures defined in the document require only minimal modifications to the RFC4960 specification. The procedures are sender-side only and do not impact the SCTP receiver.},
}