%% You should probably cite rfc9653 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-11,
    number =    {draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-11},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum/11/},
    author =    {Michael Tüxen and Victor Boivie and Florent Castelli and Randell Jesup},
    title =     {{Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2024,
    month =     jun,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) uses a 32-bit checksum in the common header of each packet to provide some level of data integrity. If another method used by SCTP already provides the same or a higher level of data integrity, computing this checksum does not provide any additional protection, but does consume computing resources. This document provides a simple extension allowing SCTP to save these computing resources by using zero as the checksum in a backwards compatible way. It also defines how this feature can be used when SCTP packets are encapsulated in Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packets.},
}