Security Attacks Found Against the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) and Current Countermeasures
draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-05
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Sam Hartman)
No Objection
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-21)
Unknown
The document does not split the references andincludes only an Informative References section. The PROTO write-up explains this on the grounds that the document is Informationat. I believe that this is wrong, as an Informational document may yet contain Normative References if these are essential reading for the understanding or implementation of the document. This seems to me to be the case with the SCTP protocol documents here.
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-05-23)
Unknown
Section 2.2: s/In closely examination this/In close examination, this/
Section 3: s/end to end/end-to-end/
Section 3.3: s/set of two 32 bit nonces/pair of 32-bit nonces/
Section 4.1: s/full four way handshake/full four-way handshake/
Section 6.3: s/end point should/end point should:/
Section 7.1: s/header i.e. X+1 or Y+1/header, i.e., X+1 or Y+1/
s/set's up/sets up/
From the Gen-ART Review by Miguel Garcia: The document is well written.
And, I agree.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown