Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench Messages
draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench-06
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(David Harrington; former steering group member) Yes
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) Yes
A document so clear that I feel comfortable balloting "Yes", even if it's not in my area.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
Thank you for this document. Clear and well constructed. I did wonder whether RFC 1016 should be moved to Historic at this time.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
This is probably late in the process, but I think that such a document should have been last-called with the OPSAWG as well and also with some of the operators fora, to make sure that there are no critical operator tools depending on the deprecated option, and for the operators to have a prior warning about the changes in the implementations resulting from the approval of this update.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection