%% You should probably cite rfc3540 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-tsvwg-tcp-nonce-04, number = {draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-nonce-04}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-nonce/04/}, author = {David Wetherall and Neil Spring and David Wetherall}, title = {{Robust Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Signaling with Nonces}}, pagetotal = 13, year = 2002, month = nov, day = 4, abstract = {This note describes the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)-nonce, an optional addition to ECN that protects against accidental or malicious concealment of marked packets from the TCP sender. It improves the robustness of congestion control by preventing receivers from exploiting ECN to gain an unfair share of network bandwidth. The ECN-nonce uses the two ECN-Capable Transport (ECT)codepoints in the ECN field of the IP header, and requires a flag in the TCP header. It is computationally efficient for both routers and hosts. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.}, }