Skip to main content

MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol
draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-03

Yes

(Magnus Westerlund)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2007-10-17) Unknown
1. New text:
"for UDP-Lite should resemble the that of UDP [RFC4113], with"
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^ Need to fix grammar.

2. In the original MIB Doctor review: 

> 13) Typo in DESCRIPTION of udpliteEndpointTable:
>     "In all cases where the remote is a wildcard, the"
>
>     Insert "address" after "remote".

NOW: "In all cases where the remote is a wildcard address,"

"remote" is not a noun, so I still consider this grammatically wrong...
"address" was inserted in the wrong place in the sentence.  Should be "In all cases where the remote address is a wildcard,"

3. It is preferable to avoid mentioning RFC numbers in the Abstract section, as these may change while this specification says. 

4. Also in the Abstract s/MIB entities/MIB objects/

5. in Section 1.1 - s/Another contrast to UDP/Another difference from the UDP MIB module/

6. DESCRIPTION clauses of udpliteEndPointLocalAddress and udpliteEndPointLocalAddress include the phrase 'else the information cannot be accessed using SNMPv1, SNMPv2c, or SNMPv3.' This is problematic because they mention older SNMP versions which are not standard, and because the limitation that is being alluded is not only of SNMP but also of the SMI. I suggest to drep this text or to replace it by 'this is because of SNMP and SMI limitations'. 

7. DESCRIPTION clause of udpliteEndpointMinCoverage s/If set to 0,/A value of 0 indicates that/

8. Section 4, paragraph 3 - s/ay/may/
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2007-10-16) Unknown
Editorial nits in Section 4, paragraph 3:

s/module ay be used/module may be used/
s/imply information/infer information/