%% You should probably cite rfc8141 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-11, number = {draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-11}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn/11/}, author = {Peter Saint-Andre and Dr. John C. Klensin}, title = {{Uniform Resource Names (URNs)}}, pagetotal = 28, year = 2015, month = mar, day = 31, abstract = {A Uniform Resource Name (URN) is a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that is assigned under the "urn" scheme and a particular URN namespace, typically with the intent that the URN will be a persistent, location-independent resource identifier or abstract designator. With regard to URN syntax, this document defines the canonical syntax for URNs (in a way that is consistent with URI syntax), specifies methods for determining URN equivalence, and discusses URI conformance. With regard to URN namespaces, this document specifies a method for defining a URN namespace and associating it with a namespace identifier, and describes procedures for registering namespace identifiers with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). This document obsoletes both RFC 2141 and RFC 3406.}, }