%% You should probably cite rfc8141 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-22,
    number =    {draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-22},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn/22/},
    author =    {Peter Saint-Andre and Dr. John C. Klensin},
    title =     {{Uniform Resource Names (URNs)}},
    pagetotal = 40,
    year =      2017,
    month =     mar,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {A Uniform Resource Name (URN) is a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that is assigned under the "urn" URI scheme and a particular URN namespace, with the intent that the URN will be a persistent, location-independent resource identifier. With regard to URN syntax, this document defines the canonical syntax for URNs (in a way that is consistent with URI syntax), specifies methods for determining URN-equivalence, and discusses URI conformance. With regard to URN namespaces, this document specifies a method for defining a URN namespace and associating it with a namespace identifier, and it describes procedures for registering namespace identifiers with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). This document obsoletes both RFCs 2141 and 3406.},
}