Skip to main content

New Protocols Using TLS Must Require TLS 1.3
draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-12

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13@ietf.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org, valery@smyslov.net
Subject: Protocol Action: 'New Protocols Must Require TLS 1.3' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-05.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'New Protocols Must Require TLS 1.3'
  (draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-05.txt) as Best Current Practice

This document is the product of the Using TLS in Applications Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Paul Wouters and Deb Cooley.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   TLS 1.2 is in use and can be configured such that it provides good
   security properties.  TLS 1.3 use is increasing, and fixes some known
   deficiencies with TLS 1.2, such as removing error-prone cryptographic
   primitives and encrypting more of the traffic so that it is not
   readable by outsiders.  For these reasons, new protocols must require
   and assume the existence of TLS 1.3.  As DTLS 1.3 is not widely
   available or deployed, this prescription does not pertain to DTLS (in
   any DTLS version); it pertains to TLS only.

   This document updates RFC9325.

Working Group Summary

   There was broad consensus.
   This document is closely related to draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen in TLS WG.
   The two document were discussed together, in particular the chairs of UTA and
   TLS WGs issued the Working Group Last Calls at the same time with
   cross-announcements.

Document Quality

   The document does not specify a protocol.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Valery Smyslov. The
   Responsible Area Director is Paul Wouters.

RFC Editor Note