%% You should probably cite rfc9325 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis/08/},
    author =    {Yaron Sheffer and Peter Saint-Andre and Thomas Fossati},
    title =     {{Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)}},
    pagetotal = 43,
    year =      2022,
    month =     jun,
    day =       25,
    abstract =  {Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used to protect data exchanged over a wide range of application protocols, and can also form the basis for secure transport protocols. Over the years, the industry has witnessed several serious attacks on TLS and DTLS, including attacks on the most commonly used cipher suites and their modes of operation. This document provides the latest recommendations for ensuring the security of deployed services that use TLS and DTLS. These recommendations are applicable to the majority of use cases. An earlier version of this document was published as RFC 7525 when the industry was in the midst of its transition to TLS 1.2. Years later this transition is largely complete and TLS 1.3 is widely available. This document updates the guidance given the new environment and obsoletes RFC 7525. In addition, the document updates RFC 5288 and RFC 6066 in view of recent attacks.},
}