Skip to main content

Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access
draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-02

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 8997.
Authors Loganaden Velvindron , Stephen Farrell
Last updated 2019-09-10
Replaces draft-lvelvindron-tls-for-email
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Became RFC 8997 (Proposed Standard)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-02
Network Working Group                                      L. Velvindron
Internet-Draft                                             cyberstorm.mu
Updates: 8314 (if approved)                                   S. Farrell
Intended status: Standards Track                  Trinity College Dublin
Expires: March 14, 2020                               September 11, 2019

               Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access
                    draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-02

Abstract

   This specification updates current recommendation for the use of
   Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to provide confidentiality of
   email between a Mail User Agent (MUA) and a Mail Submission Server or
   Mail Access Server.  This document updates RFC8314.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 14, 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Velvindron & Farrell     Expires March 14, 2020                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                TLS For Email               September 2019

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Updates to RFC8314  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     7.1.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     7.2.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   [RFC8314] defines the minimum recommended version for TLS as version
   1.1.  Due to the deprecation of TLS 1.1 in
   [I-D.ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate], this recommendation is no
   longer valid.  Therefore this document updates [RFC8314] so that the
   minimum version for TLS is TLS 1.2.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] when they
   appear in ALL CAPS.  These words may also appear in this document in
   lower case as plain English words, absent their normative meanings.

3.  Updates to RFC8314

   OLD:

   "4.1.  Deprecation of Services Using Cleartext and TLS Versions Less
   Than 1.1"

   NEW:

   "4.1.  Deprecation of Services Using Cleartext and TLS Versions Less
   Than 1.2"

   OLD

   "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets
   Layer (SSL) 2.x, SSL 3.0, or TLS 1.0 SHOULD transition their users to
   TLS 1.1 or later and discontinue support for those earlier versions
   of SSL and TLS."

Velvindron & Farrell     Expires March 14, 2020                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft                TLS For Email               September 2019

   NEW:

   "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets
   Layer (SSL) 2.x, SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 SHOULD transition their
   users to TLS 1.2 or later and discontinue support for those earlier
   versions of SSL and TLS."

   OLD:

   In Section 4.1, the text should be revised from: "It is RECOMMENDED
   that new users be required to use TLS version 1.1 or greater from the
   start.  However, an MSP may find it necessary to make exceptions to
   accommodate some legacy systems that support only earlier versions of
   TLS or only cleartext."

   NEW:

   "It is RECOMMENDED that new users be required to use TLS version 1.2
   or greater from the start.  However, an MSP may find it necessary to
   make exceptions to accommodate some legacy systems that support only
   earlier versions of TLS or only cleartext."

   OLD:

   " If, however, an MUA provides such an indication, it MUST NOT
   indicate confidentiality for any connection that does not at least
   use TLS 1.1 with certificate verification and also meet the minimum
   confidentiality requirements associated with that account.  "

   NEW:

   " If, however, an MUA provides such an indication, it MUST NOT
   indicate confidentiality for any connection that does not at least
   use TLS 1.2 with certificate verification and also meet the minimum
   confidentiality requirements associated with that account.  "

   OLD

   " MUAs MUST implement TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] or later.  Earlier TLS and
   SSL versions MAY also be supported, so long as the MUA requires at
   least TLS 1.1 [RFC4346] when accessing accounts that are configured
   to impose minimum confidentiality requirements.  "

   NEW:

   " MUAs MUST implement TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] or later e.g TLS 1.3
   [RFC8446].  Earlier TLS and SSL versions MAY also be supported, so
   long as the MUA requires at least TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] when accessing

Velvindron & Farrell     Expires March 14, 2020                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft                TLS For Email               September 2019

   accounts that are configured to impose minimum confidentiality
   requirements.  "

   OLD:

   " The default minimum expected level of confidentiality for all new
   accounts MUST require successful validation of the server's
   certificate and SHOULD require negotiation of TLS version 1.2 or
   greater.  (Future revisions to this specification may raise these
   requirements or impose additional requirements to address newly
   discovered weaknesses in protocols or cryptographic algorithms.  "

   NEW:

   " The default minimum expected level of confidentiality for all new
   accounts MUST require successful validation of the server's
   certificate and SHOULD require negotiation of TLS version 1.2 or
   greater.  (Future revisions to this specification may raise these
   requirements or impose additional requirements to address newly
   discovered weaknesses in protocols or cryptographic algorithms.  "

4.  IANA Considerations

   None of the proposed measures have an impact on IANA.

5.  Security Considerations

   The purpose of this document is to document updated recommendations
   for using TLS with Email services.  Those recommendations are based
   on [I-D.ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate].

6.  Acknowledgement

   The authors would like to thank Vittorio Bertola for his feedback.

7.  References

7.1.  Informative References

   [RFC4346]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4346, April 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4346>.

Velvindron & Farrell     Expires March 14, 2020                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft                TLS For Email               September 2019

7.2.  Normative References

   [I-D.ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate]
              Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and
              TLSv1.1", draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-05 (work in
              progress), June 2019.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.

   [RFC8314]  Moore, K. and C. Newman, "Cleartext Considered Obsolete:
              Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) for Email Submission
              and Access", RFC 8314, DOI 10.17487/RFC8314, January 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8314>.

   [RFC8446]  Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
              Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.

Authors' Addresses

   Loganaden Velvindron
   cyberstorm.mu
   88 Avenue De Plevitz Roches Brunes
   Rose Hill  71259
   Mauritius

   Phone: +230 59762817
   Email: logan@cyberstorm.mu

   Stephen Farrell
   Trinity College Dublin
   Dublin  2
   Ireland

   Phone: +353-1-896-2354
   Email: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie

Velvindron & Farrell     Expires March 14, 2020                 [Page 5]