DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-03
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bing Liu , Sheng Jiang , Ron Bonica , Xiangyang Gong , Wendong Wang | ||
| Last updated | 2015-04-30 (Latest revision 2014-10-27) | ||
| Replaces | draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Protocol includes an ICMPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) message. The RA message contains three flags, indicating which autoconfiguration mechanisms are available to on- link hosts. These are the M, O and A flags. The M and O flags are advisory, not prescriptive. This document describes divergent host behaviors observed in popular operating systems. It also describes operational problems that divergent behaviors cause.
Authors
Bing Liu
Sheng Jiang
Ron Bonica
Xiangyang Gong
Wendong Wang
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)