DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Problems on Address and DNS Configuration
draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-05
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bing Liu , Sheng Jiang , Xiangyang Gong , Wendong Wang , Enno Rey | ||
| Last updated | 2016-01-07 (Latest revision 2015-07-06) | ||
| Replaces | draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Protocol includes an ICMPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) message. The RA message contains three flags, indicating the availability of address auto-configuration mechanisms and other configuration. These are the M, O, and A flags. These flags by definition are advisory, not prescriptive. This document describes divergent host behaviors observed in popular operating systems. It also discusses operational problems that divergent behaviors might cause.
Authors
Bing Liu
Sheng Jiang
Xiangyang Gong
Wendong Wang
Enno Rey
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)