Operational Issues with Processing of the Hop-by-Hop Options Header
draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-10
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(v6ops WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Shuping Peng , Zhenbin Li , Chongfeng Xie , Zhuangzhuang Qin , Gyan Mishra | ||
Last updated | 2024-12-18 (Latest revision 2024-02-16) | ||
Replaces | draft-peng-v6ops-hbh | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
TSVART Last Call review
by Joseph Touch
On the right track
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | Tom Herbert | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2024-02-26 | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Warren "Ace" Kumari | ||
Send notices to | tom@herbertland.com | ||
IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the processing of the Hop-by-Hop Options Header (HBH) in current routers in the aspects of standards specification, common implementations, and default operations. This document outlines reasons why the Hop-by-Hop Options Header is rarely utilized in current networks. In addition, this document describes how HBH Options Header could be used as a powerful mechanism allowing deployment and operations of new services requiring a more optimized way to leverage network resources of an infrastructure. The purpose of this draft is to document reasons why HBH Options Header is rarely used within networks. It motivates the benefits and requirements needed to enable wider use of HBH Options.
Authors
Shuping Peng
Zhenbin Li
Chongfeng Xie
Zhuangzhuang Qin
Gyan Mishra
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)