%% You should probably cite rfc3794 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-trans-05, number = {draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-trans-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-trans/05/}, author = {Andreas Bergstrom and Philip J. Nesser II}, title = {{Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Transport Area Standards Track and Experimental Documents}}, pagetotal = 31, year = 2003, month = dec, day = 4, abstract = {This document seeks to document all usage of IPv4 addresses in currently deployed IETF Transport Area documented standards. In order to successfully transition from an all IPv4 Internet to an all IPv6 Internet, many interim steps will be taken. One of these steps is the evolution of current protocols that have IPv4 dependencies. It is hoped that these protocols (and their implementations) will be redesigned to be network address independent, but failing that will at least dually support IPv4 and IPv6. To this end, all Standards (Full, Draft, and Proposed) as well as Experimental RFCs will be surveyed and any dependencies will be documented. This memo provides information for the Internet community.}, }