Skip to main content

Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-07

Yes

(Joel Jaeggli)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -05) Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-16 for -06) Unknown
Given the content of the document as indicated by the Abstract, it
would be really helpful if the document title also included "failure."
Something like "Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios"
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-15 for -06) Unknown
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review questions.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05126.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-10-15 for -06) Unknown
It seems a bit odd to publish this in the IETF instead of 3GPP or the like, but presuming we're not stepping on any toes and the WG thought this was good information to put out there, I don't see any reason to object.
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown