Reasons to Move NAT-PT to Experimental
draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl-03
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(v6ops WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Cedric Aoun , Elwyn B. Davies | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2005-10-21) | ||
| Replaces | draft-aoun-v6ops-natpt-deprecate | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | David Kessens | ||
| IESG note | |||
| Send notices to | kurtis@kurtis.pp.se |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses issues with the specific form of IPv6-IPv4 protocol translation mechanism implemented by the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) defined in RFC 2766. These issues are sufficiently serious that recommending RFC 2766 as a general purpose transition mechanism is no longer desirable, and this document recommends that the IETF should reclassify RFC 2766 from Standards Track to Experimental status.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)