Expanding the IPv6 Documentation Space
draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-05

Yes

Erik Kline
Gunter Van de Velde
Paul Wouters
Éric Vyncke
(John Scudder)
(Warren Kumari)

No Objection

Deb Cooley
Jim Guichard
Mahesh Jethanandani
Roman Danyliw
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Erik Kline
Yes
Gunter Van de Velde
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2024-06-19 for -03) Sent 
A short, nice, and useful document. Thanks for taking the time for authoring it. 

Thanks to Ed Horley for the detailed shepherd write-up *but* there is no justification for the intended status (perhaps just a reference to RFC 3849 ?).

Nevertheless, I think that the document would benefit from:
- using RFC 5952 canonical IPv6 address representation (or at least stick to all lowercase or all uppercase)
- remove the BCP 14 template as it is *not* used (this will even make the I-D shorter ;-) )
- the IANA section should clearly mention "IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry" in the text (and not only as a reference)

More important, I think that the security considerations should add something like "this /20 should be considered as bogon (add reference), i.e., packets whose src/dst belongs to this /20 should be dropped over the public Internet' (note the non-normative language).
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2024-07-09) Not sent 
I agree with Éric Vyncke's comment on the Security Considerations.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2024-07-08) Not sent 
Thank you to Reese Enghardt for the GENART review.
John Scudder Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Warren Kumari Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            Yes
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                Yes 
                                
                                    (for -03)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2024-06-23 for -03)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent for earlier
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Thanks to Barry Leiba for his ARTART review.

I concur with Eric's remark about the IANA Considerations section, and would add that the first sentence doesn't seem to be complete.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2024-07-11)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Thanks for working on this document. 

If the section 4 has no content then why are we having that section?