%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-14 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-13,
    number =    {draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-13},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis/13/},
    author =    {Marcelo Bagnulo and Philip Matthews and Jordi Palet Martinez},
    title =     {{Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers}},
    pagetotal = 61,
    year =      2026,
    month =     aug,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {This document specifies a stateful NAT64 translation, which allows IPv6-Only clients to contact IPv4 servers using unicast UDP, TCP, or ICMP. One or more public IPv4 addresses assigned to a stateful NAT64 translator are shared among several IPv6-Only clients. Stateful NAT64 translation also supports IPv4-initiated communications to a subset of the IPv6 hosts through statically configured bindings in the stateful NAT64 translator. When the stateful NAT64 translation is used in conjunction with DNS64, no changes are required in either the IPv6 client or the IPv4 server. This document obsoletes RFC 6146.},
}