Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS)
draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison@ietf.org, rbonica@juniper.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, warren@kumari.net
Subject: Document Action: 'Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS'
  (draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Robert Wilton.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison/

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide
   customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only
   access and/or core network.  All these technologies have their
   advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing topology,
   skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these technologies may
   be the most appropriate solution for a network operator.

   This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies
   considering a number of different aspects to provide network
   operators with an easy to use reference to assist in selecting the
   technology that best suits their needs.

Working Group Summary

   This document provides background, summaries and guidance to help operators understand and select a transition mechanism. 

Document Quality

   The document compares transition technologies that have been deployed. It appears to draw upon operational experience.

Personnel

   Ron Bonica is DS. 
  Warren Kumari is RAD!!!!111! (Nope, this is still not old...)

RFC Editor Note