Considerations For Using Unique Local Addresses
draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (v6ops WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2017-09-14 (latest revision 2017-03-13) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations-02.txt
Abstract
This document provides considerations for using IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (ULAs). Based on an analysis of different ULA usage scenarios, this document identifies use cases where ULA addresses are helpful as well as potential problems caused by using them.
Authors
Bing Liu
(leo.liubing@huawei.com)
Sheng Jiang
(jiangsheng@huawei.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)