Considerations For Using Unique Local Addresses
draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations-04
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(v6ops WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Sheng Jiang , Bing Liu , Nick Buraglio | ||
| Last updated | 2024-11-18 (Latest revision 2024-05-17) | ||
| Replaces | draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides considerations for using IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (ULAs). Based on an analysis of different ULA usage scenarios, this document identifies use cases where ULA addresses are helpful as well as potential problems caused by using them.
Authors
Sheng Jiang
Bing Liu
Nick Buraglio
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)