@techreport{ietf-v6ops-ula-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula/02/},
    author =    {Nick Buraglio and Chris Cummings and Russ White},
    title =     {{Unintended Operational Issues With ULA}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2023,
    month =     apr,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {The behavior of ULA addressing as defined by {[}RFC6724{]} is preferred below legacy IPv4 addressing, thus rendering ULA IPv6 deployment functionally unusable in IPv4 / IPv6 dual-stacked environments. The lack of a consistent and supportable way to manipulate this behavior, across all platforms and at scale is counter to the operational behavior of GUA IPv6 addressing on nearly all modern operating systems that leverage a preference model based on {[}RFC6724{]} .},
}